Source parameters and scaling relations for small earthquakes in the Kachchh region of Gujarat, India

被引:0
作者
Santosh Kumar
Dinesh Kumar
B. K. Rastogi
机构
[1] Institute of Seismological Research,Department of Geophysics
[2] Kurukshetra University,undefined
来源
Natural Hazards | 2014年 / 73卷
关键词
Bhuj; Source parameters; Stress drop; Scaling law; Intraplate;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The scaling relationships for stress drop and corner frequency with respect to magnitude have been worked out using 159 accelerograms from 34 small earthquakes (Mw 3.3–4.9) in the Kachchh region of Gujarat. The 318 spectra of P and S waves have been analyzed for this purpose. The average ratio of P- to S-wave corner frequency is found to be 1.19 suggestive of higher corner frequency for P wave as compared to that for S wave. The seismic moments estimated from P waves, M0(P), range from 1.98 × 1014 N m to 1.60 × 1016 N m and those from S waves, M0(S), range from 1.02 × 1014 N m to 3.4 × 1016 N m with an average ratio, M0(P)/M0(S), of 1.11. The total seismic energy varies from 1.83 × 1010 J to 2.84 × 1013 J. The estimated stress drop values do not depend on earthquake size significantly and lie in the range 30–120 bars for most of the events. A linear regression analysis between the estimated seismic moment (M0) and corner frequency (fc) gives the scaling relation M0fc3 = 7.6 × 1016 N m/s3. The proposed scaling laws are found to be consistent with similar scaling relations obtained in other seismically active regions of the world. Such an investigation should prove useful in seismic hazard and risk-related studies of the region. The relations developed in this study may be useful for the seismic hazard studies in the region.
引用
收藏
页码:1269 / 1289
页数:20
相关论文
共 166 条
[31]  
Chung WY(1964)The corner frequency shift, earthquake source models and Q Bull Seismol Soc Am 54 1811-42
[32]  
Gao H(1983)A moment magnitude scale Bull Seismol Soc Am 73 157-1095
[33]  
Cloetingh S(1986)Total energy and energy spectral density of elastic wave radiation from propagating faults Bull Seismol Soc Am 76 19-54
[34]  
Wortel R(1975)Modelling some empirical vertical component Lg relations Bull Seismol Soc Am 65 1073-4748
[35]  
Dainty AM(2002)Source spectra of great earthquakes: teleseismic constraints on rupture process and strong motion Geophys Res Lett 29 51-24
[36]  
Dutta U(1979)Theoretical basis of some empirical relations in seismology J Geophys Res 84 4737-1398
[37]  
Biswas N(2005)The 2001 Bhuj earthquake: tomographic evidence for fluids at the hypocenter and its implications for rupture nucleation Tectonophysics 407 1-92
[38]  
Martirosyan A(2006)Constant Q-wave propagation and attenuation Pure Appl Geophys 163 1369-13
[39]  
Papageorgiou A(2008)Estimation of source parameters of the Himalaya earthquake of October 19, 1991, average effective shear wave attenuation parameter and local site effects from accelerograms Indian Minerals 61 83-269
[40]  
Kinoshita S(2012)A study of source parameters, site amplification functions and average effective shear wave quality factor Qseff from analysis of accelerograms of 1999 Chamoli earthquake of Himalaya Geomat Natural Hazards Risk 3 1-299