Frits Went’s Atomic Age Greenhouse: The Changing Labscape on the Lab-Field Border

被引:0
作者
Sharon E. Kingsland
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins University,Department of History of Science and Technology
来源
Journal of the History of Biology | 2009年 / 42卷
关键词
agriculture; ecology; field science; phytotron; plant physiology; California Institute of Technology; Victor E. Shelford; Frits W. Went;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In Landscapes and Labscapes Robert Kohler emphasized the separation between laboratory and field cultures and the creation of new “hybrid” or mixed practices as field sciences matured in the early twentieth century. This article explores related changes in laboratory practices, especially novel designs for the analysis of organism–environment relations in the mid-twentieth century. American ecologist Victor Shelford argued in 1929 that technological improvements and indoor climate control should be applied to ecological laboratories, but his recommendations were too ambitious for the time. In the postwar period Frits W. Went, plant physiologist at the California Institute of Technology, created a new high-tech laboratory, dubbed a “phytotron”, in the hope that it would transform plant sciences by allowing for unprecedented control of environmental variables. Went’s aspirations, the research conducted in his laboratory, and its impact in initiating an international movement, are considered. Went’s laboratory can be seen as a “hybrid culture” evolving in the laboratory, complementing and intersecting with some of the field practices that Kohler describes. It was also a countercultural movement against the reductionist trends of molecular biology in the 1950s and 1960s. By considering the history of the laboratory in relation to field sciences, we can explore how new funding sources and cross-disciplinary relations affected the development of field sciences, especially in the postwar period.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 324
页数:35
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Allard Harry A(1932)Length of Day in Relation to the Natural and Artificial Distribution of Plants Ecology 13 221-234
[2]  
Butler W.L.(1987)Sterling Brown Hendricks Biographical Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 56 180-212
[3]  
Wadleigh Cecil H(1930)Review of Ecology 11 611-614
[4]  
Cook William C(1925), by Victor E. Shelford Contributions from Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research 1 28-34
[5]  
Crocker William(1980)Aim of Boyce Thompson Research Institute for Plant Research The Botanical Review 46 447-489
[6]  
Downs Robert J(1931)Phytotrons Journal of Ecology 19 216-217
[7]  
Elton Charles(2003)Review of Victor E. Shelford, Annual Review of Plant Biology 54 1-21
[8]  
Evans Lloyd T(1920)Conjectures, Refutations, and Extrapolations Journal of Agricultural Research 18 553-606
[9]  
Garner W.W.(1922)Effect of the Relative Length of Day and Night and Other Factors of the Environment on Growth and Reproduction in Plants Science 55 582-583
[10]  
Allard H.A(2003)Photoperiodism, the Response of the Plant to Relative Length of Day and Night Chronica Horticulturae 43 6-9