Prediction and driving factors of forest fire occurrence in Jilin Province, China

被引:6
作者
Gao, Bo [1 ]
Shan, Yanlong [1 ]
Liu, Xiangyu [1 ]
Yin, Sainan [1 ]
Yu, Bo [1 ]
Cui, Chenxi [1 ]
Cao, Lili [1 ]
机构
[1] Beihua Univ, Wildland Fire Prevent & Fighting Innovat Ctr, Forestry Coll, 3999 Binjiang East Rd, Jilin 132013, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Forest fire; Occurrence prediction; Forest fire driving factors; Generalized linear regression models; Machine learning models; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; WILDFIRE IGNITION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; DANGER; IMPACTS; MODELS; AREA; PROBABILITY; TEMPERATURE; MOUNTAINS;
D O I
10.1007/s11676-023-01663-w
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Forest fires are natural disasters that can occur suddenly and can be very damaging, burning thousands of square kilometers. Prevention is better than suppression and prediction models of forest fire occurrence have developed from the logistic regression model, the geographical weighted logistic regression model, the Lasso regression model, the random forest model, and the support vector machine model based on historical forest fire data from 2000 to 2019 in Jilin Province. The models, along with a distribution map are presented in this paper to provide a theoretical basis for forest fire management in this area. Existing studies show that the prediction accuracies of the two machine learning models are higher than those of the three generalized linear regression models. The accuracies of the random forest model, the support vector machine model, geographical weighted logistic regression model, the Lasso regression model, and logistic model were 88.7%, 87.7%, 86.0%, 85.0% and 84.6%, respectively. Weather is the main factor affecting forest fires, while the impacts of topography factors, human and social-economic factors on fire occurrence were similar.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Andrews P.L., 2018, The Rothermel Surface Fire Spread Model and Associated Developments: A Comprehensive Explanation, P121
[2]   Current status and future needs of the BehavePlus Fire Modeling System [J].
Andrews, Patricia L. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2014, 23 (01) :21-33
[3]   Evaluation of fire danger rating indexes using logistic regression and percentile analysis [J].
Andrews, PL ;
Loftsgaarden, DO ;
Bradshaw, LS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2003, 12 (02) :213-226
[4]   Performance Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods for Forest Fire Modeling and Prediction [J].
Binh Thai Pham ;
Jaafari, Abolfazl ;
Avand, Mohammadtaghi ;
Al-Ansari, Nadhir ;
Tran Dinh Du ;
Hoang Phan Hai Yen ;
Tran Van Phong ;
Duy Huu Nguyen ;
Hiep Van Le ;
Mafi-Gholami, Davood ;
Prakash, Indra ;
Hoang Thi Thuy ;
Tran Thi Tuyen .
SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2020, 12 (06)
[5]   Application of artificial neural networks and logistic regression to the prediction of forest fire danger in Galicia using MODIS data [J].
Bisquert, Mar ;
Caselles, Eduardo ;
Manuel Sanchez, Juan ;
Caselles, Vicente .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2012, 21 (08) :1025-1029
[6]   Poisson mixed models for predicting number of fires [J].
Boubeta, Miguel ;
Jose Lombardia, Maria ;
Marey-Perez, Manuel ;
Morales, Domingo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2019, 28 (03) :237-253
[7]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[8]  
Cardille JA, 2001, ECOL APPL, V11, P111, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0111:EASFIW]2.0.CO
[9]  
2
[10]   Modeling and mapping wildfire ignition risk in Portugal [J].
Catry, Filipe X. ;
Rego, Francisco C. ;
Bacao, Fernando ;
Moreira, Francisco .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2009, 18 (08) :921-931