See No Evil: The Effect of Communication Medium and Motivation on Deception Detection

被引:0
作者
Jeffrey T. Hancock
Michael T. Woodworth
Saurabh Goorha
机构
[1] Cornell University,Department of Communication and Faculty of Computing and Information Science
[2] University of British Columbia Okanagan,undefined
来源
Group Decision and Negotiation | 2010年 / 19卷
关键词
Deception detection; Lying; Deception; Computer-mediated communication; Motivation; Interpersonal communication;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The present study reports an experiment that examines the role of communication medium and liar motivation on deception detection. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two dyadic communication conditions, text-based, computer-mediated environment or face-to-face, and to one of two motivation conditions, high or low. Participants engaged in a discussion of four topics, in which one participant was deceptive during two topics and truthful during the other two. No main effect of communication medium or motivation level was observed. However, an interaction effect suggests that highly motivated liars interacting in a text-based, computer- mediated environment were the most successful in deceiving their partners. The implications of these results are discussed both in terms of the elimination of non- verbal cues, as well as the potential advantages to the motivated liar offered by text-based media.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 343
页数:16
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]  
Anderson DE(1999)Beliefs about cues to deception: mindless stereotypes or untapped wisdom J Nonverbal Behav 23 67-89
[2]  
DePaulo BM(2002)The development of deception detection skill: a longitudinal study of same sex friends Pers Soc Psychol Bull 28 536-545
[3]  
Ansfield ME(1996)Interpersonal deception theory Commun Theory 3 203-242
[4]  
Tickle JJ(2000)Testing the motivational impairment effect during deceptive and truthful interactions West J Commun 64 243-267
[5]  
Green E(1994)Interpersonal deception: VI. Viewing deception success from deceiver and observer perspectives: effects of preinteractional and interactional factors Commun Stud 45 263-280
[6]  
Anderson DE(1999)The role of conversational involvement in deceptive interpersonal interactions Pers Soc Psychol Bull 25 669-686
[7]  
DePaulo BM(2001)Does participation affect deception success? A test of the interactivity principle Hum Commun Res 27 503-534
[8]  
Ansfield ME(2002)Testing the interactivity principle: effects of mediation, propinquity, and verbal and nonverbal modalities in interpersonal interaction J Commun 52 657-677
[9]  
Buller DB(2004)Deception in computer-mediated communication Group Decis Negot 13 5-28
[10]  
Burgoon JK(1995)Demeanor and credibility Semiotica 106 5-54