Food safety and security and the dose-response

被引:0
作者
Edward J. Calabrese
机构
[1] University of Massachusetts,Department of Public Health, Environmental Health Sciences
来源
Food Security | 2013年 / 5卷
关键词
Dose-response; Hormesis; Hormetic; Biphasic; Adaptive response; Food safety;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Getting the dose-response right is a critical component in the assessment of chemical food safety. Being able to validate dose-response model predictions in the low-dose zone would be a critical aspect of the assurances that correct decisions about food safety and security are made. The present paper examines the history of the threshold dose-response model and how it became incorporated into governmental regulatory and risk assessment activities, including those affecting chemical food safety. The present analysis reveals that the major risk assessment models used by international regulatory agencies, such as the threshold dose-response model, were never validated prior to their acceptance and use by international regulatory agencies. Furthermore, once they were tested both the threshold and linear dose-response models failed to make accurate predictions in the low-dose zone. The only model providing accurate predictions in the low dose zone was the hormetic dose-response, a model not used by regulatory agencies. The present analysis raises important new questions for the risk assessment process in general and that of chemical food security in particular.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 102
页数:7
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Calabrese EJ(2005)Historical blunders: how toxicology got the dose-response relationship half right Cellular and Molecular Biology 51 643-654
[2]  
Calabrese EJ(2009)Getting the dose-response wrong. Why hormesis became marginalized and the threshold model accepted Archives of Toxicology 83 227-247
[3]  
Calabrese EJ(2009)The road to linearity: why linearity at low doses became the basis for carcinogen risk assessment Archives of Toxicology 83 203-225
[4]  
Calabrese EJ(2010)Hormesis is central to toxicology, pharmacology and risk assessment Human and Experimental Toxicology 29 249-261
[5]  
Calabrese EJ(2011)Toxicology rewrites its history and rethinks its future: giving equal focus to both harmful and beneficial effects Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 30 2658-2673
[6]  
Calabrese EJ(2011)Key studies to support cancer risk assessment questioned Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 52 595-606
[7]  
Calabrese EJ(2011)Muller’s Nobel lecture on dose-response for ionizing radiation: ideology or science? Archives of Toxicology 85 1495-1498
[8]  
Calabrese EJ(2012)Muller’s Nobel Prize lecture: when ideology prevailed over science Toxicological Sciences 126 1-4
[9]  
Calabrese EJ(2000)Chemical hormesis: its historical foundations as a biological hypothesis Human and Experimental Toxicology 19 2-31
[10]  
Baldwin LA(2000)The marginalization of hormesis Human and Experimental Toxicology 19 32-40