共 62 条
[1]
Calabrese EJ(2005)Historical blunders: how toxicology got the dose-response relationship half right Cellular and Molecular Biology 51 643-654
[2]
Calabrese EJ(2009)Getting the dose-response wrong. Why hormesis became marginalized and the threshold model accepted Archives of Toxicology 83 227-247
[3]
Calabrese EJ(2009)The road to linearity: why linearity at low doses became the basis for carcinogen risk assessment Archives of Toxicology 83 203-225
[4]
Calabrese EJ(2010)Hormesis is central to toxicology, pharmacology and risk assessment Human and Experimental Toxicology 29 249-261
[5]
Calabrese EJ(2011)Toxicology rewrites its history and rethinks its future: giving equal focus to both harmful and beneficial effects Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 30 2658-2673
[6]
Calabrese EJ(2011)Key studies to support cancer risk assessment questioned Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 52 595-606
[7]
Calabrese EJ(2011)Muller’s Nobel lecture on dose-response for ionizing radiation: ideology or science? Archives of Toxicology 85 1495-1498
[8]
Calabrese EJ(2012)Muller’s Nobel Prize lecture: when ideology prevailed over science Toxicological Sciences 126 1-4
[9]
Calabrese EJ(2000)Chemical hormesis: its historical foundations as a biological hypothesis Human and Experimental Toxicology 19 2-31
[10]
Baldwin LA(2000)The marginalization of hormesis Human and Experimental Toxicology 19 32-40