Bargaining under time pressure from deadlines

被引:0
作者
Emin Karagözoğlu
Martin G. Kocher
机构
[1] Bilkent University,
[2] CESifo Munich,undefined
[3] Institute for Advanced Studies,undefined
[4] University of Vienna,undefined
[5] University of Gothenburg,undefined
来源
Experimental Economics | 2019年 / 22卷
关键词
Bargaining; Deadline effect; Disagreements; Reference points; Time pressure; C71; C91; D74;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We experimentally investigate the effect of time pressure from deadlines in a rich-context bargaining game with an induced reference point at the 2/3-1/3 distribution. Our results show that first proposals, concessions, and settlements are very similar for different time-pressure levels. Nevertheless, time pressure systematically influences the type of agreements reached: the likelihood of bargainers reaching agreements on the equal split is lower under time pressure. Furthermore, disagreements and last-moment-agreements (conditional on reaching an agreement) are more frequently observed under time pressure, though the effect on last-moment agreements disappears when disagreements are included in the analysis. Finally, the effect of time-pressure on the frequency of disagreements is stronger for those pairs with higher tension in first proposals.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 440
页数:21
相关论文
共 83 条
  • [1] Alberti F(2017)Concession bargaining: An experimental comparison of protocols and time horizons Journal of Conflict Resolution 85 1337-1343
  • [2] Fischer S(1995)Biased judgments of fairness in bargaining American Economic Review 99 164-179
  • [3] Güth W(2016)On the influence of hard leverage in a soft leverage bargaining game: The importance of credible claims Games and Economic Behavior 37 211-231
  • [4] Tsutsui K(1994)Divide the dollar: Three solutions and extensions Theory and Decision 32 940-950
  • [5] Babcock L(2011)Being of two minds: Ultimatum offers under cognitive constraints Journal of Economic Psychology 30 636-659
  • [6] Loewenstein G(1986)Time pressure and the development of integrative agreements in bilateral negotiations Journal of Conflict Resolution 43 531-582
  • [7] Issacharoff S(1992)Negotiation and mediation Annual Review of Psychology 77 223-236
  • [8] Camerer C(2014)Implementing equal division with an ultimatum threat Theory and Decision 29 596-615
  • [9] Bolton GE(1987)Glaube an eine gerechte Welt als Motiv: Validierungskorrelate zweier Skalen Pschologische Beiträge 7 357-393
  • [10] Karagözoğlu E(2012)Optimal deadlines for agreements Theoretical Economics 91 280-295