Biomechanical cadaver study of proximal fixation in a minimally invasive bipolar construct

[1] Miladi L(2018)Minimally invasive surgery for neuromuscular scoliosis: results and complications in a series of one hundred patients Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 43 E968-2537

[2] Gaume M(2019)Correction of adult spinal deformity with a minimally invasive fusionless bipolar construct: Preliminary results Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 30 2530-1835

[3] Khouri N(2005)Pedicle screw fixation of the thoracic spine: an in vitro biomechanical study on different configurations Spine 28 1829-343

[4] Topouchian V(2003)Posterior thoracic extrapedicular fixation: a biomechanical study Spine 6 335-487

[5] Glorion C(2016)Biomechanical analysis of the proximal adjacent segment after multilevel instrumentation of the thoracic spine: do hooks ease the transition? Global Spine J 33 482-2001

[6] Wolf S(2008)Biomechanical contribution of transverse connectors to segmental stability following long segment instrumentation with thoracic pedicle screws Spine 22 1568-942

[7] Deviren V(1997)Mechanical stability of thoraco-lumbar pedicle screw fixation. The effects of crosslinks Spine 27 937-1214

[8] Acaroglu E(2002)Axial and tangential fixation strength of pedicle screws versus hooks in the thoracic spine in relation to bone mineral density Spine 16 1209-E1693

[9] Morgenstern CW(2007)A biomechanical analysis of the self-retaining pedicle hook device in posterior spinal fixation Eur Spine J 4 e5-1880

[10] Ferguson S(2016)Challenging the conventional standard for thoracic spine range of motion. A systematic review JBJS Rev 23 E1686-658

[1] Miladi L(2018)Minimally invasive surgery for neuromuscular scoliosis: results and complications in a series of one hundred patients Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 43 E968-2537

[2] Gaume M(2019)Correction of adult spinal deformity with a minimally invasive fusionless bipolar construct: Preliminary results Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 30 2530-1835

[3] Khouri N(2005)Pedicle screw fixation of the thoracic spine: an in vitro biomechanical study on different configurations Spine 28 1829-343

[4] Topouchian V(2003)Posterior thoracic extrapedicular fixation: a biomechanical study Spine 6 335-487

[5] Glorion C(2016)Biomechanical analysis of the proximal adjacent segment after multilevel instrumentation of the thoracic spine: do hooks ease the transition? Global Spine J 33 482-2001

[6] Wolf S(2008)Biomechanical contribution of transverse connectors to segmental stability following long segment instrumentation with thoracic pedicle screws Spine 22 1568-942

[7] Deviren V(1997)Mechanical stability of thoraco-lumbar pedicle screw fixation. The effects of crosslinks Spine 27 937-1214

[8] Acaroglu E(2002)Axial and tangential fixation strength of pedicle screws versus hooks in the thoracic spine in relation to bone mineral density Spine 16 1209-E1693

[9] Morgenstern CW(2007)A biomechanical analysis of the self-retaining pedicle hook device in posterior spinal fixation Eur Spine J 4 e5-1880

[10] Ferguson S(2016)Challenging the conventional standard for thoracic spine range of motion. A systematic review JBJS Rev 23 E1686-658