A phase II study of biweekly paclitaxel and cisplatin chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: ERCC1 expression predicts response to chemotherapy

被引:0
作者
Jing Huang
Yi Zhou
Hongtu Zhang
Tao Qu
Yousheng Mao
Hongxia Zhu
Lanping Quan
Puyuan Xing
Jinwan Wang
Jie He
Ningzhi Xu
Yan Sun
机构
[1] Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CAMS & PUMC),Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute & Hospital
[2] CAMS & PUMC,Department of Pathology, Cancer Institute & Hospital
[3] CAMS & PUMC,Department of Thoracic Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute & Hospital
[4] CAMS & PUMC,Laboratory of Cell and Molecular Biology, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Cancer Institute & Hospital
来源
Medical Oncology | 2013年 / 30卷
关键词
Paclitaxel; Cisplatin esophageal cancer; ERCC1 expression;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Recurrent or metastatic esophageal cancer has poor prognosis. This study was to assess the efficacy and safety of biweekly paclitaxel and cisplatin combination for patients with recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) expression to predict response is also assessed. Forty-six eligible patients were enrolled. Paclitaxel was given at 150 mg/m2 over 3 h on day 1, and cisplatin was given at 50 mg/m2 on day 2, every 2 weeks as one cycle. ERCC1 protein expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry staining. The overall response rate was 56.5 % (26/46, 95 % CI 42.2–70.8 %). Progression-free survival was 5.6 months (95 % CI, 2.8–8.4 months), and the median actuarial survival time was 17.0 months (95 % CI, 12.3–21.7 months). There was a significant difference in median actuarial survival between the patients with a response compared to the non-responders (22.8 months vs. 7.4 months, P < 0.0001). Overall survival at 1 year was 65.0 %, and at 2 years was 34.0 %, respectively. The most frequent toxicity for all patients was neutropenia (37.0 and 23.9 % for grades 3 and 4, respectively). Patients with ERCC1 negative tumors had a higher treatment response than the ERCC1 positive group (radiological response rates; 92.3 % vs.50 %, P = 0.013). Biweekly chemotherapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin was found to be active and generally well tolerated. Our study indicates that the expression of ERCC1 evaluated by immunohistochemistry is a promising predictive marker for response in patients with metastatic ESCC receiving cisplatin–paclitaxel regimen.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 136 条
[1]  
Chen WQ(2010)Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2006 Chin J Cancer Res 23 3-9
[2]  
Zhang SW(2010)Cancer statistics, 2010 CA Cancer J Clin 60 277-300
[3]  
Zou XN(1997)Randomised phase II study of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) versus cisplatin alone in advanced squamous cell oesophageal cancer Eur J Cancer 33 1216-1220
[4]  
Zhao P(2007)Palliative chemotherapy for recurrent and metastatic esophageal cancer Anticancer Res 27 2705-2714
[5]  
Jemal A(1994)Activity of taxol in patients with squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus J Natl Cancer Inst 86 1086-1091
[6]  
Siegel R(2004)Phase II study of paclitaxel and cisplatin for advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of esophagus Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 26 753-755
[7]  
Xu J(2008)ERCC1 protein expression predicts the response of cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer Lung Cancer. 59 377-384
[8]  
Ward E(2010)Thymidine synthase, thymidine phosphorylase, and excision repair cross-complementation group 1 expression as predictive markers of capecitabine plus cisplatin chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma Br J Cancer 103 845-851
[9]  
Bleiberg H(2006)IALT bio investigators. DNA repair by ERCC1 in non-small-cell lung cancer and cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy N Engl J Med 355 983-991
[10]  
Conroy T(1989)Optimal two stage designs for phase II clinical trials Control Clin Trials 10 1-10