Capability-based governance patterns over the product life-cycle: an agent-based model

被引:0
作者
B. Vermeulen
A. Pyka
J. A. La Poutré
A. G. de Kok
机构
[1] Eindhoven University of Technology,School of Industrial Engineering
[2] University of Hohenheim,Institute of Economics
[3] CWI - Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science,Department of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science
[4] Delft University of Technology,undefined
来源
Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination | 2018年 / 13卷
关键词
Vertical governance; Capabilities; Imitability; Substitutability; Product life-cycle; Agent-based model;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In recent literature, there is disagreement over the temporal pattern of vertical governance of firms over the product life-cycle. We use a novel neo-Schumpeterian agent-based simulation model to investigate emerging patterns of vertical governance for different levels of imitability and substitutability of capabilities. We find that, in the mature phase of the product life-cycle, firms generally prefer vertical specialization. However, in the early phase, imitability and substitutability, in interplay, determine the governance form preferred. High imitability frustrates appropriation and thereby discourages integration for synergistic advantages. However, firms need not vertically specialize: under low substitutability, incompatibilities reduce the advantages of specialization. When both substitutability and imitability are low, firms can appropriate the value of their inventions and there is no combinatorial advantage of specialization, so firms predominantly integrate. If substitutability is high and imitability is low, the combinatorial advantage of specialization balances with the synergistic advantage of integration.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 349
页数:38
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Afuah A(2000)How much do your co-opetitors’ capabilities matter in the face of technological change Strateg Manag J 21 387-404
  • [2] Afuah A(2001)Dynamic boundaries of the firm: are firms better off being vertically integrated in the face of a technological change? Acad Manag J 44 1211-1228
  • [3] Anderson P(1990)Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: a cyclical model of technological change Adm Sci Q 35 604-633
  • [4] Tushman M(1986)Technical change, competition and vertical integration Strateg Manag J 7 347-359
  • [5] Balakrishnan S(1969)A new product growth model for consumer durables Manag Sci 15 215-227
  • [6] Wernerfelt B(2000)When shakeout doesn’t occur: the evolution of the turboprop engine industry Res Policy 29 847-870
  • [7] Bass FM(2005)The dynamic limits of specialization: vertical integration reconsidered Organ Stud 26 1851-1883
  • [8] Bonaccorsi A(1998)The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage Acad Manag Rev 23 660-679
  • [9] Giuri P(2003)Exploitation, exploration and innovation in a model of endogenous growth with locally interacting agents Struct Change Econ Dyn 14 237-273
  • [10] Cacciatori E(1971)A simple substitution model of technological change Technol Forecast Soc Chang 3 75-88