Gene fragmentation: a key to mitochondrial genome evolution in Euglenozoa?

被引:0
作者
Pavel Flegontov
Michael W. Gray
Gertraud Burger
Julius Lukeš
机构
[1] University of South Bohemia,Biology Centre, Institute of Parasitology, Czech Academy of Sciences, and Faculty of Sciences
[2] Dalhousie University,Centre for Comparative Genomics and Evolutionary Bioinformatics, and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
[3] Université de Montréal,Robert
来源
Current Genetics | 2011年 / 57卷
关键词
Euglena; Diplonema; Mitochondrial genome; RNA editing; Constructive neutral evolution;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Phylum Euglenozoa comprises three groups of eukaryotic microbes (kinetoplastids, diplonemids, and euglenids), the mitochondrial (mt) genomes of which exhibit radically different modes of organization and expression. Gene fragmentation is a striking feature of both euglenid and diplonemid mtDNAs. To rationalize the emergence of these highly divergent mtDNA types and the existence of insertion/deletion RNA editing (in kinetoplastids) and trans-splicing (in diplonemids), we propose that in the mitochondrion of the common evolutionary ancestor of Euglenozoa, small expressed gene fragments promoted a rampant neutral evolutionary pathway. Interactions between small antisense transcripts of these gene fragments and full-length transcripts, assisted by RNA-processing enzymes, permitted the emergence of RNA editing and/or trans-splicing activities, allowing the system to tolerate indel mutations and further gene fragmentation, respectively, and leading to accumulation of additional mutations. In this way, dramatically different mitochondrial genome structures and RNA-processing machineries were able to evolve. The paradigm of constructive neutral evolution acting on the widely different mitochondrial genetic systems in Euglenozoa posits the accretion of initially neutral molecular interactions by genetic drift, leading inevitably to the observed ‘irremediable complexity’.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 232
页数:7
相关论文
共 187 条
[11]  
Lukeš J(2010)Mitochondria of protists Science 330 920-921
[12]  
Benne R(2009)Irremediable complexity? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106 3859-3864
[13]  
Cavalier-Smith T(2002)Phylogenetic analyses support the monophyly of Excavata and resolve relationships among eukaryotic “supergroups” Curr Opin Microbiol 5 620-626
[14]  
Covello PS(2010)Rewriting the information in DNA: RNA editing in kinetoplastids and myxomycetes Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107 E26-642
[15]  
Gray MW(2003)Reply to Speijer et al.: Does complexity necessarily arise from selective advantage? Mol Biol (Mosk) 37 637-1034
[16]  
Deschamps P(2009)Reduction of the edited domain of the mitochondrial A6 gene for ATPase subunit 6 in Trypanosomatidae Nucl Acids Res 37 1011-2004
[17]  
Lara E(2008)Darwinian evolution in the light of genomics Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105 1999-182
[18]  
Marande W(1993)Adaptations of Nature 363 179-739
[19]  
López-García P(2002) to gradual loss of kinetoplast DNA: J Mol Biol 320 727-369
[20]  
Ekelund F(2005) and Trends Parasitol 21 363-5098