Gene fragmentation: a key to mitochondrial genome evolution in Euglenozoa?

被引:0
作者
Pavel Flegontov
Michael W. Gray
Gertraud Burger
Julius Lukeš
机构
[1] University of South Bohemia,Biology Centre, Institute of Parasitology, Czech Academy of Sciences, and Faculty of Sciences
[2] Dalhousie University,Centre for Comparative Genomics and Evolutionary Bioinformatics, and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
[3] Université de Montréal,Robert
来源
Current Genetics | 2011年 / 57卷
关键词
Euglena; Diplonema; Mitochondrial genome; RNA editing; Constructive neutral evolution;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Phylum Euglenozoa comprises three groups of eukaryotic microbes (kinetoplastids, diplonemids, and euglenids), the mitochondrial (mt) genomes of which exhibit radically different modes of organization and expression. Gene fragmentation is a striking feature of both euglenid and diplonemid mtDNAs. To rationalize the emergence of these highly divergent mtDNA types and the existence of insertion/deletion RNA editing (in kinetoplastids) and trans-splicing (in diplonemids), we propose that in the mitochondrion of the common evolutionary ancestor of Euglenozoa, small expressed gene fragments promoted a rampant neutral evolutionary pathway. Interactions between small antisense transcripts of these gene fragments and full-length transcripts, assisted by RNA-processing enzymes, permitted the emergence of RNA editing and/or trans-splicing activities, allowing the system to tolerate indel mutations and further gene fragmentation, respectively, and leading to accumulation of additional mutations. In this way, dramatically different mitochondrial genome structures and RNA-processing machineries were able to evolve. The paradigm of constructive neutral evolution acting on the widely different mitochondrial genetic systems in Euglenozoa posits the accretion of initially neutral molecular interactions by genetic drift, leading inevitably to the observed ‘irremediable complexity’.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 232
页数:7
相关论文
共 187 条
  • [1] Adl S(2005)The new higher level classification of eukaryotes with emphasis on the taxonomy of protists J Euk Microbiol 52 399-451
  • [2] Simpson AGB(1990)RNA editing in trypanosomes—is there a message? Trends Genet 6 177-181
  • [3] Farmer MA(1998)RNA editing in the free-living bodonid Nucl Acids Res 26 1205-1213
  • [4] Andersen RA(1997)Cell and genome coevolution: facultative anaerobiosis, glycosomes and kinetoplastan RNA editing TIG 13 6-9
  • [5] Benne R(1993)On the evolution of RNA editing Trends Genet 9 265-268
  • [6] Blom D(2011)Phylogenomic analysis of kinetoplastids supports that trypanosomatids arose from within bodonids Mol Biol Evol 28 53-58
  • [7] de Haan A(2001)Guide RNAs of the recently isolated LEM125 strain of RNA 7 1335-1347
  • [8] van den Berg M(2005): an unexpected complexity RNA 11 29-37
  • [9] Sloof P(2003)The 3′-untranslated region of cytochrome oxidase II mRNA functions in RNA editing of African trypanosomes exclusively as a cis guide RNA IUBMB Life 55 227-233
  • [10] Jirků M(2004)Diversity and evolution of mitochondrial RNA editing systems Annu Rev Genet 38 477-524