Acute atomoxetine treatment of younger and older children with ADHD: A meta-analysis of tolerability and efficacy

被引:41
作者
Kratochvil C.J. [1 ]
Milton D.R. [2 ]
Vaughan B.S. [1 ]
Greenhill L.L. [3 ]
机构
[1] University of Nebraska Medical Center, 985581 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha
[2] Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis
[3] New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032
关键词
Subscale Score; Oppositional Defiant Disorder; ADHD Symptom; Atomoxetine; Oppositional Defiant Disorder;
D O I
10.1186/1753-2000-2-25
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Atomoxetine is FDA-approved as a treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in patients aged 6 years to adult. Among pediatric clinical trials of atomoxetine to date, six with a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design were used in this meta-analysis. The purpose of this article is to describe and compare the treatment response and tolerability of atomoxetine between younger children (6-7 years) and older children (8-12 years) with ADHD, as reported in these six acute treatment trials. Methods: Data from six clinical trials of 6-9 weeks duration were pooled, yielding 280 subjects, ages 6-7 years, and 860 subjects, ages 8-12 years with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV)-diagnosed ADHD. Efficacy was analyzed using the ADHD Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS), Conners' Parent Rating Scale-revised (CPRS-R:S), and the Clinical Global Impression of ADHD Severity (CGI-ADHD-S). Results: Atomoxetine was superior to placebo in both age categories for mean (SD) change in ADHD-RS total, total T, and subscale scores; 3 CPRS-R:S subscales; and CGI-ADHD-S from baseline. Although there were no significant treatment differentials between the age groups for these efficacy measures, the age groups themselves, regardless of treatment, were significantly different for ADHD-RS total (younger: ATX = -14.2 [13.8], PBO = -4.6 [10.4]; older: ATX = -15.4 [13.2], PBO = -7.3 [12.0]; p = .001), total T (younger: ATX = -15.2 [14.8], PBO = -4.9 [11.2]; older: ATX = -16.4 [14.6], PBO = -7.9 [13.1]; p = .003), and subscale scores (Inattentive: younger: ATX = -7.2 [7.5], PBO = -2.4 [5.7]; older: ATX = -8.0 [7.4], PBO = -3.9 [6.7]; p = .043; Hyperactive/Impulsive: younger: ATX = -7.0 [7.2], PBO = -2.1 [5.4]; older: ATX = -7.3 [7.0], PBO = -3.4 [6.3]; p < .001), as well as the CGI-ADHD-S score (younger: ATX = -1.2 [1.3], PBO = -0.5 [0.9]; older: ATX = -1.4 [1.3], PBO = -0.7 [1.1]; p = .010). Although few subjects discontinued from either age group due to adverse events, a significant treatment-by-age-group interaction was observed for abdominal pain (younger: ATX = 19%, PBO = 6%; older: ATX = 15%, PBO = 13%; p = .044), vomiting (younger: ATX = 14%, PBO = 2%; older: ATX = 9%, PBO = 6%; p = .053), cough (younger: ATX = 10%, PBO = 6%; older: ATX = 3%, PBO = 9%; p = .007), and pyrexia (younger: ATX = 5%, PBO = 2%; older: ATX = 3%, PBO = 5%; p = .058). Conclusion: Atomoxetine is an effective and generally well-tolerated treatment of ADHD in both younger and older children as assessed by three recognized measures of symptoms in six controlled clinical trials. © 2008 Kratochvil et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 25 条
[21]  
DuPaul G.J., Power T.J., Anastopoulos A.D., Reid R., ADHD Rating Scale-IV: Checklists, Norms, and Clinical Interpretations, (1998)
[22]  
Conners C.K., Conners' Rating Scales: Revised Technical Manual, (1997)
[23]  
Guy W., ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology, Revised. Publication ADM 76-338, (1976)
[24]  
SAS/STAT Software: Changes and Enhancements Through Release 6.12, (1997)
[25]  
Kratochvil C.J., Wilens T.E., Greenhill L.L., Gao H., Baker K.D., Feldman P.D., Gelowitz D.L., Effects of long-term atomoxetine treatment for young children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 45, pp. 919-927, (2006)