Contested agri-food futures: Introduction to the Special Issue

被引:0
作者
Mascha Gugganig
Karly Ann Burch
Julie Guthman
Kelly Bronson
机构
[1] University of Munich (LMU),Chair of Life Sciences in Society
[2] Technical University Munich,Department of Science, Technology and Society
[3] Waipapa Taumata Rau University of Auckland,Department of Sociology, School of Social Sciences
[4] University of California,Department of Sociology, Community Studies Program
[5] University of Ottawa,School of Sociological and Anthropological Studies
来源
Agriculture and Human Values | 2023年 / 40卷
关键词
Agrifood studies; Science and technology studies (STS); Food; Agriculture; FoodTech; AgTech; Agritech; Agrifood tech; Agri-food-tech; Agri-food technology; Agri-tech imaginaries; Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity; Collaboration;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Over recent decades, influential agri-food tech actors, institutions, policymakers and others have fostered dominant techno-optimistic, future visions of food and agriculture that are having profound material impacts in present agri-food worlds. Analyzing such realities has become paramount for scholars working across the fields of science and technology studies (STS) and critical agri-food studies, many of whom contribute to STSFAN—the Science and Technology Studies Food and Agriculture Network. This article introduces a Special Issue featuring the scholarship of STSFAN members, which cover a range of case studies and interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary engagements involving such contested agri-food futures. Their contributions are unique in that they emerged from the network’s specific modus operandi: a workshopping practice that supports the constructive, interdisciplinary dialogue necessary for critical research and rigorous analyses of science and technology in agri-food settings. This introduction offers an overview of STS and critical agri-food studies scholarship, including their historical entanglements in respective studies of food scandals, scientific regimes and technological determinism. We illustrate how interdisciplinary engagement across these fields has contributed to the emergent field of what we term agri-food technoscience scholarship, which the contributions of this Special Issue speak to. After a brief discussion of STS concepts, theories and methods shaping agri-food policy, technology design and manufacturing, we present the eleven Special Issue contributions in three thematic clusters: influential actors and their agri-food imaginaries; obfuscated (material) realities in agri-food technologies; and conflictual and constructive engagements in academia and agri-food. The introduction ends with a short reflection on future research trajectories in agri-food technoscience scholarship.
引用
收藏
页码:787 / 798
页数:11
相关论文
共 268 条
[1]  
Ahteensuu M(2012)Assumptions of the deficit model type of thinking: Ignorance, attitudes, and science communication in the debate on genetic engineering in agriculture Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 295-313
[2]  
Akram-Lodhi AH(2007)Land, markets and neoliberal enclosure: An agrarian political economy perspective Third World Quarterly 28 1437-1456
[3]  
Arnold N(2022)Governing food futures: Towards a ‘responsibility turn’ in food and agriculture Journal of Rural Studies 89 82-86
[4]  
Brunori G(2011)Constructing credibility: Using technoscience to legitimate strategies in agrifood governance Journal of Rural Social Sciences 25 160-192
[5]  
Dessein J(2020)Emerging sociotechnical imaginaries for gene edited crops for foods in the United States: Implications for governance Agriculture and Human Values 37 265-279
[6]  
Galli F(2023)Inserting machines, displacing people: How automation imaginaries for agriculture promise ‘liberation’ from the industrialized farm Agriculture and Human Values 32 58-82
[7]  
Ghosh R(2023)Conscious, complacent, fearful: Agri-food tech’s market-making public imaginaries Science as Culture 23 580-584
[8]  
Loconto AM(2023)More bytes per acre: Do vertical farming’s land sparing promises stand on solid ground? Agriculture and Human Values 2 62-77
[9]  
Maye D(2023)Improving the agri-food biotechnology conversation: Bridging science communication with science and technology studies Agriculture and Human Values 8 7-14
[10]  
Bain C(2022)Food system innovations, science communication, and deficit model 2.0: Implications for cellular agriculture Environmental Communication 90–91 100294-5