Assessment and comparison of Digital Elevation Model (DEM) products in varying topographic, land cover regions and its attribute: a case study in Shikoku Island Japan

被引:0
作者
Kwanchai Pakoksung
Masataka Takagi
机构
[1] Tohoku University,International Research Institute of Disaster Science
[2] Kochi University of Technology,Infrastructure Systems Engineering
来源
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment | 2021年 / 7卷
关键词
Digital Elevation Models; DEM accuracy; Accuracy assessment; Terrain morphology;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Digital Elevation Model (DEM) is the model of Earth’s surface and is significantly variable for science application. The DEMs based on free provided are the 10 m DEM produced by the Geographical Survey Institute of Japan (GSI-DEM), Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) Global DEM, Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM), Global Multi-resolution Terrain Elevation Data 2010 (GMTED2010), Hydrological data and maps based on Shuttle Elevation Derivatives at multiple Scales (HydroSHEDS), and Global 30 Arc-Second Elevation (GTOPO30) that are normally used in scientific researches. These terrain data have been generated by different methods, such as Stereoscopic Photogrammetry, RADAR-SAR interferometry, LIDAR, and GPS. The generated data contain an error from collecting and processing methods that have related to morphology relief and land cover type. In this study, the six open-source DEMs and their attributes are evaluated by the referent elevation points observed by GPS, in Shikoku Island Japan. It was revealed that the error of DEMs is an effect on the terrain characteristic. Overall, the accuracy values of fine-resolution DEMs based on the RMSE value are 5.9 m, 9.9 m, and 10.1 m for GSI-DEM, ASTER, and SRTM, respectively. The coarse-resolution DEMs revealed the accuracy of RMSE as 18.2 m, 69.4 m, and 61.8 m for GMTED2010, HydroSHEDS, and GTOPO30, respectively. The accuracy of the slope and river network is also evaluated. This approach might be used to recommend for a new generation of DEM and revealed for the accuracy of the Earth’s surface.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 484
页数:19
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Athmania D(2014)External validation of the ASTER GDEM2, GMTED2010 and CGIAR-CSI-SRTM v4.1 free access digital elevation models (DEMs) in Tunisia and Algeria Remote Sens 6 4600-4620
[2]  
Achour H(2006)Causes and consequences of error in digital elevation models Prog Phys Geogr 30 467-489
[3]  
Fisher PF(2002)Processing of IKONOS imagery for submeter 3D positioning and building extraction ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 56 177-194
[4]  
Tate NJ(1999)Use of geomorphological units to improve drainage network extraction from a DEM JAG J 1 187-195
[5]  
Fraser CS(2011)Techniques for quantifying the accuracy of gridded elevation models and for mapping uncertainty in digital terrain analysis Prog Phys Geogr 35 739-764
[6]  
Baltsavias E(2006)Geomorphometry from SRTM-comparison to NED Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 72 269-277
[7]  
Gruen A(2009)The influence of elevation uncertainty on derivation of topographic indices Geomorphology 111 4-16
[8]  
Garcia MJL(2010)Comparison and validation of the recent freely available ASTER-GDEM ver1 SRTM Ver4.1 and GEODATA DEM-9s Ver3 Digital Elevation Models over Australia Aust J Earth Sci 57 337-347
[9]  
Camarasa AM(2000)Error in USGS 30-meter digital elevation model and its impact on terrain modeling J Hydrol 233 154-173
[10]  
Gonga-Saholiariliva N(1988)Extracting topographic structures from digital elevation data from geographic information system analysis Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 54 1593-1600