The Partner Context of Sexual Minority Women’s and Men’s Cybersex Experiences: Implications for the Traditional Sexual Script

被引:0
作者
Erin Leigh Courtice
Krystelle Shaughnessy
机构
[1] University of Ottawa,School of Psychology
来源
Sex Roles | 2018年 / 78卷
关键词
Cybersex; Online sexual activity; Sexual behavior; Internet; Sexuality; Sexual orientation; Sexual minority; LGB; Anonymity; Traditional sexual script; Script theory; Quin-A Engine; Gender differences; Relationships;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Cybersex refers to a subgroup of interactive, interpersonal online sexual activities. People can engage in cybersex with three types of partners: (a) a primary committed partner, (b) a known non-partner, and, (c) a stranger. These partner types differ in degree of anonymity—one of five characteristics that make the internet appealing for sexual activity according to the Quin-A Engine. Previously, researchers have found that the partner context of heterosexual people’s cybersex experiences largely conform to the traditional sexual script (TSS; a cultural set of norms that incorporates traditional gender roles). However, researchers have not examined whether the TSS is apparent in sexual minority people’s cybersex experiences. The goal of the present study was to examine the role of anonymity and sexual scripts in sexual minority women’s and men’s cybersex experiences. Sexual minority women (n = 143) and men (n = 103) completed an online survey that included questions about lifetime prevalence and frequency of cybersex within each partner context. Findings demonstrated that more women engaged in cybersex with a primary partner compared to men, and that more men than women reported cybersex outside a committed-partner context and engaged in it more frequently. Implications for sexual education, clinical practice, and personal safety navigation for sexual minority people are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:272 / 285
页数:13
相关论文
共 160 条
[61]  
Mitchell KJ(2013)Premarital sexual standards and sociosexuality: Gender, ethnicity, and cohort differences Archives of Sexual Behavior 42 122-132
[62]  
Ybarra ML(2003)Technological tearoom trade: Characteristics of Swedish men visiting gay internet chat rooms AIDS Education & Prevention 15 195-212
[63]  
Howell JL(2011)The use of protection for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and unwanted pregnancy among Norwegian heterosexual young adults 2009 Sexuality & Culture 15 2273-2285
[64]  
Egan PM(2015)Changes in American adults’ sexual behavior and attitudes, 1972–2012 Archives of Sexual Behavior 44 1-10
[65]  
Giuliano TA(2014)Sexual orientation and health among U.S. adults: National health interview survey, 2013 National Health Statistics Reports 77 75-91
[66]  
Ackley BD(2011)Taking casual sex not too casually: Exploring definitions of casual sexual relationships The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality 20 496-502
[67]  
Jonason PK(2005)The gendered nature of sexual scripts The Family Journal 13 1144-1149
[68]  
Li NP(2005)The trouble with “MSM” and “WSW”: Erasure of the sexual-minority person in public health discourse American Journal of Public Health 95 333-344
[69]  
Richardson J(2014)Ambivalent sexism and the sexual double standard Sex Roles 71 undefined-undefined
[70]  
Karlsen M(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined