The Partner Context of Sexual Minority Women’s and Men’s Cybersex Experiences: Implications for the Traditional Sexual Script

被引:0
作者
Erin Leigh Courtice
Krystelle Shaughnessy
机构
[1] University of Ottawa,School of Psychology
来源
Sex Roles | 2018年 / 78卷
关键词
Cybersex; Online sexual activity; Sexual behavior; Internet; Sexuality; Sexual orientation; Sexual minority; LGB; Anonymity; Traditional sexual script; Script theory; Quin-A Engine; Gender differences; Relationships;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Cybersex refers to a subgroup of interactive, interpersonal online sexual activities. People can engage in cybersex with three types of partners: (a) a primary committed partner, (b) a known non-partner, and, (c) a stranger. These partner types differ in degree of anonymity—one of five characteristics that make the internet appealing for sexual activity according to the Quin-A Engine. Previously, researchers have found that the partner context of heterosexual people’s cybersex experiences largely conform to the traditional sexual script (TSS; a cultural set of norms that incorporates traditional gender roles). However, researchers have not examined whether the TSS is apparent in sexual minority people’s cybersex experiences. The goal of the present study was to examine the role of anonymity and sexual scripts in sexual minority women’s and men’s cybersex experiences. Sexual minority women (n = 143) and men (n = 103) completed an online survey that included questions about lifetime prevalence and frequency of cybersex within each partner context. Findings demonstrated that more women engaged in cybersex with a primary partner compared to men, and that more men than women reported cybersex outside a committed-partner context and engaged in it more frequently. Implications for sexual education, clinical practice, and personal safety navigation for sexual minority people are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:272 / 285
页数:13
相关论文
共 160 条
[1]  
Abelson RP(1981)Psychological status of the script concept American Psychologist 36 715-729
[2]  
Alexander MG(2003)Truth and consequences: Using the bogus pipeline to examine sex differences in self-reported sexuality Journal of Sex Research 40 27-35
[3]  
Fisher TD(2013)A double standard for “hooking up”: How far have we come toward gender equality? Social Science Research 42 1191-1206
[4]  
Allison R(2006)The dating game: Similarities and differences in dating scripts among college students Sexuality and Culture 10 54-80
[5]  
Risman BJ(2001)Is there a gender difference in strength of sex drive? Theoretical views, conceptual distinctions, and a review of relevant evidence Personality and Social Psychology Review 5 242-273
[6]  
Bartoli A(2014)Can less be more? Comparing duration vs. frequency of sexual encounters in same-sex and mixed-sex relationships Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality 23 123-136
[7]  
Clark M(2005)Your picture is your bait: Use and meaning of cyberspace among gay men Journal of Sex Research 42 63-73
[8]  
Baumeister RF(1996)How well does the traditional sexual script explain sexual coercion? Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality 8 7-25
[9]  
Catanese KR(2014)Attitudes toward online sexual activities Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 8 138-150
[10]  
Vohs KD(2013)Casual sexual relationships and experiences in emerging adulthood Emerging Adulthood 1 1-30