Framing effects in the prisoner’s dilemma but not in the dictator game

被引：0
作者：
Sebastian J. Goerg
David Rand
Gari Walkowitz
机构：
[1] Technical University Munich,TUMCS for Biotechnology and Sustainability
[2] Technical University Munich,TUM School of Management
[3] IZA-Institute of Labor Economics,Sloan School of Management
[4] MPI for Research on Collective Goods,Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
[5] Massachusetts Institute of Technology,TUM School of Governance and Center Digitization Bavaria
[6] Massachusetts Institute of Technology,undefined
[7] Technical University of Munich,undefined
[8] National Research University Higher School of Economics,undefined
来源：
Journal of the Economic Science Association | 2020年 / 6卷
关键词：
Prisoner’s dilemma; Dictator game; Framing; Give; Take; Cooperation; Generosity; A13; C72; C91; F51; Z13;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
We systematically investigate prisoner’s dilemma and dictator games with valence framing. We find that give versus take frames influence subjects’ behavior and beliefs in the prisoner’s dilemma games but not in the dictator games. We conclude that valence framing has a stronger impact on behavior in strategic interactions, i.e., in the prisoner’s dilemma game, than in allocation tasks without strategic interaction, i.e., in the dictator game.
引用
收藏
页码：1 / 12
页数：11
相关论文
共 90 条
  • [1] Andreoni J(1995)Warm glow versus cold prickle: The effects of positive and negative framing on cooperation in experiments Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 1-21
  • [2] Arechar A(2018)Conducting interactive experiments online Experimental Economics 21 99-131
  • [3] Gächter S(2008)Dictator game giving: Altruism or artefact? Experimental Economics 11 122-133
  • [4] Molleman L(2000)ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition American Economic Review 90 166-193
  • [5] Bardsley G(2018)Gender differences in altruism on Mechanical Turk: Expectations and actual behaviour Economics Letters 170 19-23
  • [6] Bolton G(2018)Do the right thing: Experimental evidence that preferences for moral behavior, rather than equity or efficiency per se, drive human prosociality Judgment and Decision Making 13 99-111
  • [7] Ockenfels A(2019)The power of moral words: Loaded language generates framing effects in the extreme dictator game Judgment and Decision Making 14 309-317
  • [8] Brañas-Garza P(2016)A comment on framing effects in linear public good games Journal of the Economic Science Association 2 73-84
  • [9] Capraro V(2019)Framing in public good games: Choices or externalities? Economics Letters 179 42-45
  • [10] Rascón-Ramírez E(2002)Understanding social preferences with simple tests Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 817-869
123456789