Pre-induction with mifepristone for second trimester termination of pregnancy

被引:5
作者
Kulkarni K.K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Terna Medical College, Navi Mumbai
关键词
Mifepristone; Misoprostol; Second trimester abortion; Termination of pregnancy;
D O I
10.1007/s13224-013-0472-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To study the efficacy and safety of combining mifepristone before misoprostol use in second trimester to considerably reduce the induction-abortion interval with the lowest possible dose and adverse reaction. Material and methods: A prospective study was conducted which included 60 patients visiting the antenatal OPD for elective abortions between 13 and 20 weeks of gestation as per the MTP act. They were randomly divided into two groups of 30 each - the study group received mifepristone 200 mg orally before misoprostol, whereas the control group was induced with misoprostol alone. The results were analyzed. Observation: Statistical analysis of the study was done using χ2 test. The induction-abortion interval was significantly shorter in the study group, thereby decreasing the side-effects of the drug as well as duration of hospital stay. Conclusion: This study, like many others, offers a reliable, safe, and cost-effective option by combining mifepristone before misoprostol to decrease the induction-abortion interval. © Federation of Obstetric & Gynecological Societies of India 2013.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 104
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Medical termination of pregnancy in the second trimester
    Greco, R
    Scioscia, M
    Vimercati, A
    Selvaggi, L
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2003, 63 (07) : 648 - 650
  • [32] Mifepristone combined with ethacridine lactate for the second-trimester pregnancy termination in women with placenta previa and/or prior cesarean deliveries
    Chen, Chunqin
    Lin, Feikai
    Wang, Xiaoyun
    Jiang, Yaping
    Wu, Sufang
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2017, 295 (01) : 119 - 124
  • [33] One- and two-day dosing intervals between mifepristone and misoprostol in second trimester medical termination of pregnancy-a randomized trial
    Mentula, Maarit
    Suhonen, Satu
    Heikinheimo, Oskari
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2011, 26 (10) : 2690 - 2697
  • [34] One- and two-day mifepristone-misoprostol intervals for second trimester termination of pregnancy between 13 and 16 weeks of gestation
    Hou, Shuping
    Zhang, Lanrong
    Chen, Qinfang
    Fang, Aihua
    Cheng, Linan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2010, 111 (02) : 126 - 130
  • [35] First trimester termination of pregnancy
    Lui, Man-Wa
    Ho, Pak-Chung
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2020, 63 : 13 - 23
  • [36] Induction of labor with vaginal misoprostol for second trimester termination of pregnancy in the scarred uterus
    Herabutya, Y
    Chanarachakul, B
    Punyavachira, P
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2003, 83 (03) : 293 - 297
  • [37] Different dosing intervals of mifepristone-misoprostol for second-trimester termination of pregnancy: A meta-analysis and systematic review
    Wu, Limei
    Xiong, Wanchun
    Zeng, Manman
    Yan, Aihua
    Song, Ling
    Chen, Meng
    Wei, Tianqin
    Zu, Qian
    Zhang, Jiayin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2021, 154 (02) : 195 - 203
  • [38] Mifepristone-Misoprostol Use for Second- and Third-Trimester Medical Termination of Pregnancy in a Canadian Tertiary Care Centre
    Vlad, Sergiu
    Boucoiran, Isabelle
    St-Pierre, Emilie Roy
    Ferreira, Ema
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2022, 44 (06) : 683 - 689
  • [39] A randomised study of two doses of gemeprost in combination with mifepristone for induction of abortion in the second trimester of pregnancy
    Thong, KJ
    Lynch, P
    Baird, DT
    CONTRACEPTION, 1996, 54 (02) : 97 - 100
  • [40] Comparison of two dose regimens of misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy termination
    Brouns, Joseph Franciscus Gertrudis Maria
    van Wely, Madelon
    Burger, Mattheus Petrus Maria
    van Wijngaarden, Willem Jacobus
    CONTRACEPTION, 2010, 82 (03) : 266 - 275