CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

被引:0
作者
Kenneth F Schulz
Douglas G Altman
David Moher
机构
[1] Research Triangle Park,Family Health International
[2] University of Oxford,Centre for Statistics in Medicine
[3] Wolfson College,Ottawa Methods Centre, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine
[4] University of Ottawa,undefined
来源
Trials | / 11卷
关键词
Reporting Guideline; Consort Statement; Item Number; Checklist Item; Transparent Reporting;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The CONSORT statement is used worldwide to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials. Kenneth Schulz and colleagues describe the latest version, CONSORT 2010, which updates the reporting guideline based on new methodological evidence and accumulating experience.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 194 条
[1]  
Jüni P(2001)Systematic reviews in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials BMJ 323 42-6
[2]  
Altman DG(2005)Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals Lancet 365 1159-62
[3]  
Egger M(2008)What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? BMJ 336 1472-4
[4]  
Chan AW(2008)Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias PLoS ONE 3 e3081-9
[5]  
Altman DG(1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement JAMA 276 637-4
[6]  
Glasziou P(2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials Lancet 357 1191-62
[7]  
Meats E(2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials Ann Intern Med 134 657-91
[8]  
Heneghan C(2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials JAMA 285 1987-7
[9]  
Shepperd S(2006)Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review Med J Aust 185 263-8
[10]  
Dwan K(2010)The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: a comparative study of articles indexed by PubMed BMJ 340 c723-60