International Society for Quality of Life Research commentary on the US Food and Drug Administration draft guidance for industry on core patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials

被引:0
作者
Keri J. S. Brady
John Devin Peipert
Thomas M. Atkinson
Cecilia Pompili
Monica Pinto
James W. Shaw
Jessica Roydhouse
机构
[1] Sanofi,Department of Medical Social Sciences
[2] Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine,Patient
[3] Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center,Centred Outcomes Research (PCOR)
[4] University of Leeds,Rehabilitation Medicine Unit
[5] Istituto Nazionale Tumori – IRCCS – Fondazione G. Pascale,Menzies Institute for Medical Research
[6] Bristol Myers Squibb,undefined
[7] University of Tasmania,undefined
来源
Quality of Life Research | 2023年 / 32卷
关键词
Patient-reported outcomes; Clinical outcome assessment; Guidance; Oncology; Trial;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In June 2021, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a draft guidance for industry on core patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and related considerations for instrument selection and trial design in registrational cancer clinical trials, building on prior communications about the use of PROs to assess efficacy and tolerability in oncology drug development. The International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) Standards and Best Practices Committee led an initiative to draft a commentary about the guidance, focusing on its positive aspects and areas that would benefit from additional clarification and consideration. For comprehensiveness, the authors reviewed existing public comments on the draft guidance, and the commentary underwent a thorough review process through three ISOQOL Special Interest Groups (Psychometrics, Clinical Practice, and Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment Engagement) followed by the ISOQOL Board. The goal of this commentary is to situate this new and relevant guidance document within the context of recent regulatory efforts on PROs and highlight areas in which further work may ultimately benefit the field.
引用
收藏
页码:2155 / 2163
页数:8
相关论文
共 260 条
  • [11] Rowland JH(2018)Patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events: Methods for item selection in industry-sponsored oncology clinical trials Clinical Trials 15 616-20
  • [12] Montello M(2017)Integrating the patient voice with clinician reports to identify a hepatocellular carcinoma-specific subset of treatment-related symptomatic adverse events Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes 2 35-e148
  • [13] Geoghegan C(2022)The value of patient-reported outcomes in early-phase clinical trials Nature Medicine 28 18-579
  • [14] Abernethy AP(2022)Key considerations to reduce or address respondent burden in patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collection Nature Communications 13 6026-453
  • [15] Clauser SB(2019)Feasibility assessment of using the complete patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE) item library The Oncologist 24 e146-325
  • [16] Castro K(2014)Optimizing dosing of oncology drugs Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 96 572-1934
  • [17] Mitchell SA(2021)The use of patient-reported outcome measures in phase I oncology clinical trials Oncology 99 444-209
  • [18] Burke L(2022)Using patient-reported outcomes in dose-finding oncology trials: Surveys of Key Stakeholders and the National Cancer Research Institute Consumer Forum The Oncologist 39 310-4
  • [19] Trentacosti AM(2020)Incorporating patient-reported outcomes in dose-finding clinical trials Statistics in Medicine 5 36-381
  • [20] Basch EM(2021)Patient-reported outcomes in breast cancer FDA drug labels and review documents Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes 34 1928-3103