The perceptual wink model of non-switching attentional blink tasks

被引:0
作者
Patrice Rusconi
David E. Huber
机构
[1] University of Surrey,School of Psychology
[2] University of Massachusetts,Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences
来源
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review | 2018年 / 25卷
关键词
Attentional blink; Priming; Neural network modeling; Visual perception;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The attentional blink (AB) is a temporary deficit for a second target (T2) when that target appears after a first target (T1). Although sophisticated models have been developed to explain the substantial AB literature in isolation, the current study considers how the AB relates to perceptual dynamics more broadly. We show that the time-course of the AB is closely related to the time course of the transition from positive to negative repetition priming effects in perceptual identification. Many AB tasks involve a switch between a T1 defined in one manner and a T2 defined in a different manner. Other AB tasks are non-switching, with all targets belonging to the same well-known category (e.g., letter targets versus number distractors) or sharing the same perceptual feature. We propose that these non-switching AB tasks reflect perceptual habituation for the target-defining attribute; thus, a ‘perceptual wink’, with perception of one attribute (target identity) undisturbed while perception of another (target detection) is impaired. On this account, the immediate benefit following T1 (lag-1 sparing) reflects positive repetition priming and the subsequent deficit (the blink) reflects negative repetition priming for the realization that a target occurred. In developing the perceptual wink model, we extended the nROUSE model of perceptual priming to explain the results of two new experiments combining the AB and identity repetitions. This establishes important connections between non-switching AB tasks and perceptual dynamics.
引用
收藏
页码:1717 / 1739
页数:22
相关论文
共 169 条
[1]  
Awh E(2004)Evidence against a central bottleneck during the attentional blink: Multiple channels for configural and featural processing Cognitive Psychology 48 95-126
[2]  
Serences J(1953)Action potentials from the frogs retina Journal of Physiology-London 119 58-68
[3]  
Laurey P(2007)The simultaneous type, serial token model of temporal attention and working memory Psychological Review 114 38-70
[4]  
Dhaliwal H(2015)Task switching mediates direct interference of intertarget distractors in the attentional blink: An event-related potential study Psychophysiology 52 919-932
[5]  
van der Jagt T(1987)From detection to identification—response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation Perception & Psychophysics 42 105-113
[6]  
Dassonville P(2007)A temporal ratio model of memory Psychological Review 114 539-576
[7]  
Barlow HB(2015)Revisiting the spread of sparing in the attentional blink Attention Perception & Psychophysics 77 1596-1607
[8]  
Bowman H(2001)Nature of codes extracted during the attentional blink Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance 27 1229-1242
[9]  
Wyble B(1997)Temporal binding errors are redistributed by the attentional blink Perception & Psychophysics 59 1191-1199
[10]  
Brisson B(1997)Types and tokens in visual processing: A double dissociation between the attentional blink and repetition blindness Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance 23 738-755