PET image segmentation using a Gaussian mixture model and Markov random fields

被引:23
作者
Layer T. [1 ,2 ]
Blaickner M. [2 ]
Knäusl B. [3 ]
Georg D. [3 ]
Neuwirth J. [4 ]
Baum R.P. [5 ]
Schuchardt C. [5 ]
Wiessalla S. [5 ]
Matz G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Institute of Telecommunications, Vienna University of Technology, Karlsplatz 13, Vienna
[2] Health & Environment Department, Austrian Institute of Technology, Donau-City-Strasse 1/2, Vienna
[3] Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna/AKH Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna
[4] Radiation Safety and Applications, Seibersdorf Labor GmbH, 2444 Seibersdorf, Seibersdorf
[5] THERANOSTICS Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Molecular Imaging (PET/CT) ENETS Center of Excellence, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Robert-Koch-Allee 9, 99437 Bad Berka, Bad Berka
关键词
Expectation maximization; Markov random field; Positron emission tomography; Radiotherapy; Tumor segmentation;
D O I
10.1186/s40658-015-0110-7
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Classification algorithms for positron emission tomography (PET) images support computational treatment planning in radiotherapy. Common clinical practice is based on manual delineation and fixed or iterative threshold methods, the latter of which requires regression curves dependent on many parameters. Methods: An improved statistical approach using a Gaussian mixture model (GMM) is proposed to obtain initial estimates of a target volume, followed by a correction step based on a Markov random field (MRF) and a Gibbs distribution to account for dependencies among neighboring voxels. In order to evaluate the proposed algorithm, phantom measurements of spherical and non-spherical objects with the smallest diameter being 8 mm were performed at signal-to-background ratios (SBRs) between 2.06 and 9.39. Additionally 68Ga-PET data from patients with lesions in the liver and lymph nodes were evaluated. Results: The proposed algorithm produces stable results for different reconstruction algorithms and different lesion shapes. Furthermore, it outperforms all threshold methods regarding detection rate, determines the spheres’ volumes more accurately than fixed threshold methods, and produces similar values as iterative thresholding. In a comparison with other statistical approaches, the algorithm performs equally well for larger volumes and even shows improvements for small volumes and SBRs. The comparison with experts’ manual delineations on the clinical data shows the same qualitative behavior as for the phantom measurements. Conclusions: In conclusion, a generic probabilistic approach that does not require data measured beforehand is presented whose performance, robustness, and swiftness make it a feasible choice for PET segmentation. © 2015, Layer et al.; licensee Springer.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 15
页数:14
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Hamilton C.S., Ebert M.A., Volumetric uncertainty in radiotherapy, Clin Oncol., 17, pp. 456-464, (2005)
[2]  
Greco C., Rosenzweig K., Cascini G.L., Tamburrini O., Current status of PET/CT for tumour volume definition in radiotherapy treatment planning for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), Lung Cancer., 57, pp. 125-134, (2007)
[3]  
Breen S.L., Publicover J., De Silva S., Pond G., Brock K., O'Sullivan B., Et al., Intraobserver and interobserver variability in GTV delineation on FDG-PET-CT images of head and neck cancers, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys., 68, pp. 763-770, (2007)
[4]  
Morarji K., Fowler A., Vinod S.K., Ho Shon I., Laurence J.M., Impact of FDG-PET on lung cancer delineation for radiotherapy, J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol., 56, pp. 195-203, (2012)
[5]  
Erdi Y.E., Mawlawi O., Larson S.M., Imbriaco M., Yeung H., Finn R., Et al., Segmentation of lung lesion volume by adaptive positron emission tomography image thresholding, Cancer., 80, pp. 2505-2509, (1997)
[6]  
Erdi Y.E., Rosenzweig K., Erdi A.K., Macapinlac H.A., Hu Y.C., Braban L.E., Et al., Radiotherapy treatment planning for patients with non-small cell lung cancer using positron emission tomography (PET), Radiother Oncol., 62, pp. 51-60, (2002)
[7]  
MacManus M., Nestle U., Rosenzweig K.E., Carrio I., Messa C., Belohlavek O., Et al., Use of PET and PET/CT for radiation therapy planning: IAEA expert report 2006-2007, Radiother Oncol., 91, pp. 85-94, (2009)
[8]  
Daisne J.F., Sibomana M., Bol A., Doumont T., Lonneux M., Gregoire V., Tri-dimensional automatic segmentation of PET volumes based on measured source-to-background ratios: influence of reconstruction algorithms, Radiother Oncol., 69, pp. 247-250, (2003)
[9]  
Brambilla M., Matheoud R., Secco C., Loi G., Krengli M., Inglese E., Threshold segmentation for PET target volume delineation in radiation treatment planning: the role of target-to-background ratio and target size, Med Phys., 35, pp. 1207-1213, (2008)
[10]  
Jentzen W., Freudenberg L., Eising E.G., Heinze M., Brandau W., Bockisch A., Segmentation of PET volumes by iterative image thresholding, J Nucl Med., 48, pp. 108-114, (2007)