Prostate vaporization in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia by using a 200-W high-intensity diode laser

被引：7

作者：

Chiang P.-H. ^{[1
]}

Chen C.-H. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Urology, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Taiwan, 123, Niaosung, Kaohsiung, Ta-Pei Road

来源：

Current Urology Reports | 2010年 / 11卷 / 4期

关键词：

Benign prostatic hyperplasia; Diode laser; Laser prostatectomy; Lower urinary tract symptoms;

D O I：

10.1007/s11934-010-0116-6

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

The recent introduction of high-power 200-W diode laser vaporization of the prostate has resulted in new interest in minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Although clinical reports are still limited, experimental ex vivo or in vivo models have demonstrated that this laser device offers improved ablative and hemostatic abilities. Some preliminary clinical results have proven that this laser technique can efficiently improve the symptoms of BPH. However, this still requires long-term evidence to support the use of this laser device. In this article, we review the latest experience with this laser technique and compare other laser systems in the treatment of BPH in recent years. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010.

引用

页码：249 / 253

页数：4

共 29 条

[1]

Madersbacher S., Alivizatos G., Nordling J., Et al., EAU 2004 guidelines on assessment, therapy and follow-up of men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction (BPH guidelines), Eur Urol, 46, pp. 547-554, (2004)

[2]

Kaplan S.A., AUA guidelines and their impact on the management of BPH: An update, Rev Urol, 6, SUPPL 9, (2004)

[3]

Costello A.J., Bowsher W.G., Bolton D.M., Et al., Laser ablation of the prostate in patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy, Br J Urol, 69, pp. 603-608, (1992)

[4]

Planz B., Kalem T., Sprenger C., Et al., A prospective randomized study of combined visual laser ablation and transurethral resection of the prostate versus transurethral prostatectomy alone, Urol Int, 71, pp. 26-30, (2003)

[5]

Kursh E.D., Concepcion R., Chan S., Et al., Interstitial laser coagulation versus transurethral prostate resection for treating benign prostatic obstruction: A randomized trial with 2-year follow-up, Urology, 61, pp. 573-578, (2003)

[6]

Muschter R., Free-beam and contact laser coagulation, J Endourol, 17, pp. 579-585, (2003)

[7]

Gupta N., Sivaramakrishna Kumar R., Et al., Comparison of standard transurethral resection, transurethral vapour resection and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for managing benign prostatic hyperplasia of >40 g, BJU Int, 97, pp. 85-89, (2006)

[8]

Elzayat E.A., Elhilali M.M., Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP): Long-term results, reoperation rate, and possible impact of the learning curve, Eur Urol, 52, pp. 1465-1472, (2007)

[9]

Seki N., Mochida O., Kinukawa N., Et al., Holmium laser enucleation for prostatic adenoma: Analysis of learning curve over the course of 70 consecutive cases, J Urol, 170, pp. 1847-1850, (2003)

[10]

Reich O., Bachmann A., Siebels M., Et al., High power (80 W) potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporization of the prostate in 66 high risk patients, J Urol, 173, pp. 158-160, (2005)

← 1 2 3 →