Evaluating likelihood-based photogrammetry for individual recognition of four species of northern ungulates

被引:0
作者
Isobel F. G. Ness
Thomas S. Jung
Fiona K. A. Schmiegelow
机构
[1] University of Alberta,Department of Renewable Resources
[2] Government of Yukon,Department of Environment
[3] Yukon University,Yukon Research Centre
来源
Mammalian Biology | 2022年 / 102卷
关键词
Capture–mark–recapture; Facial recognition; Morphometrics; Observer bias; Ungulates; Photogrammetry; Seasonality;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Estimating abundance is a key component of wildlife management and capture–mark–recapture (CMR) methods are commonly used. Photography has been widely explored as a method of ‘marking’ individuals for CMR. However, it is most often used on species with unique markings, and application to species without obvious marks remains challenging. We tested a likelihood-based photogrammetric method to identify individuals from four species of ungulates: muskox (Ovibos moschatus; 31 photos of 16 individuals), thinhorn sheep (Ovis dalli; 110 photos of 32 individuals), mountain goats (Oreamnos americanus; 47 photos of 19 individuals) and mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus; 60 photos of 30 individuals). Misidentification rates (false rejection [FRR] and false acceptance [FAR] rates) varied widely between species (FRR =  < 1–13%, FAR = 2–22%), as did matching success rates (48–96%). Muskox and sheep had the highest matching success rates (96% and 88%, respectively), while those for goats (80%) and deer (58%) were lower. Automated matching success rate for deer and sheep, calculated based on the top-ranked photograph, was compared to a user-generated matching success rate. The latter was significantly higher in all cases, indicating that the final subjective step was important. Significant observer bias was found for deer, but not sheep. The main findings of our study were that a photogrammetric approach to individual recognition of ungulates was species specific and sensitive to the inclusion of horn measurements, season, photo quality, and final selection from top choices by the user. While matching success rates of photogrammetry was reasonably good (> 90%) for muskox, it was only moderately accurate 80–90% for sheep and goats, and poor (< 80%) for deer. Future work should address the temporal stability of horn measurements, seasonal effects, feasibility of capturing useable photographs from remote cameras, and application to other species.
引用
收藏
页码:701 / 718
页数:17
相关论文
共 212 条
[1]  
Abramoff MD(2004)Image processing with ImageJ Biophotonics Int 11 36-42
[2]  
Magalhaes PJ(2015)Mark-recapture and mark-resight methods for estimating abundance with remote cameras: a carnivore case study PLoS ONE 10 1867-1877
[3]  
Ram SJ(2008)Identifying elephant photos by multi-curve matching Pattern Recognit 41 243-247
[4]  
Alonso RS(2008)Comparison of two computer-assisted photo-identification methods applied to sperm whales ( Aquat Mamm 31 771-783
[5]  
McClintock BT(2009)) Anim Behav 77 769-777
[6]  
Lyren LM(2012)The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis Conserv Biol 26 289-292
[7]  
Boydston EE(2007)Estimation of body-size traits by photogrammetry in large mammals to inform conservation J Wildl Manag 71 813-822
[8]  
Crooks KR(2012)Parallel lasers for remote measurements of morphological traits Methods Ecol Evol 3 675-685
[9]  
Ardovini A(2015)A computer-assisted system for photographic mark-recapture analysis J Appl Ecol 52 671-675
[10]  
Cinque L(1999)Wildlife camera trapping: a review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processes Wildl Soc Bull 27 1257-1266