The role of perceptions about trade and inequality in the backlash against globalization

被引:0
作者
Barbara Dluhosch
机构
[1] Helmut Schmidt University,Department of Business and Economics
来源
SN Business & Economics | / 1卷 / 12期
关键词
Perceptions; Income distribution; International trade; Protectionism; Globalization;
D O I
10.1007/s43546-021-00171-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Many countries in the Western hemisphere are experiencing a political backlash against globalization. When explaining this phenomenon, much of the extant research draws on the distributional effects of international competition, in particular the opposition to trade by those who are adversely affected. Using cross-sectional data on subjective well-being from the World Values Survey and the European Values Study and combing these self-reports with trade and incomes data, this paper contributes to this strand of research by focusing on the subjective element in the formation of anti-trade sentiments. It thus explores how the role of international trade in the income distribution is being perceived at the individual level. Simulations based on the data reveal that matters of income inequality are evaluated differently, depending on how deeply the respective economy is integrated into world markets: results suggest that the extent of trade globalization amplifies any negative effect of income inequality on subjective well-being. If the role of international openness in the income distribution is perceived to be more pronounced than it actually is, the subjective element has wider politico-economic implications; it carries the risk of costly anti-trade policies without necessarily narrowing the income distribution.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 141 条
[1]  
Alesina A(2004)Inequality and happiness: are Europeans and Americans different? J Public Econ 88 2009-42
[2]  
Di Tella R(2020)Importing political polarization? The electoral consequences of rising trade exposure Am Econ Rev 110 3139-83
[3]  
MacCulloch R(2015)Globalization and the transmission of social values: the case of tolerance J Comp Econ 43 371-89
[4]  
Autor D(2008)Cross-country determinants of life satisfaction: exploring different determinants across groups in society Soc Choice Welf 30 119-73
[5]  
Dorn D(2013)Inequality and happiness: when perceived social mobility and economic reality do not match J Econ Behav Organ 91 75-92
[6]  
Hanson G(2010)Stata tip 87: interpretation of interactions in nonlinear models Stata J 10 305-08
[7]  
Majlesi K(2015)Rising morbidity and mortality in midlife among white non-hispanic americans in the 21st century Proc Natl Acad Sci 112 15078-83
[8]  
Berggren N(2020)Globalization and electoral outcomes: evidence from Italy Econ Polit 32 68-103
[9]  
Nilsson T(2008)Relative income, happiness and utility: an explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles J Econ Lit 46 95-144
[10]  
Bjørnskov C(2018)The trade origins of economic nationalism: import competition and voting behavior in Western Europe Am J Polit Sci 62 936-53