Chromosomal and genetic imbalances in synovial sarcoma detected by conventional and microarray comparative genomic hybridization

被引:0
作者
Yasuko Nakagawa
Kunihiko Numoto
Aki Yoshida
Toshiyuki Kunisada
Hidenori Ohata
Ken Takeda
Daniel Wai
Christopher Poremba
Toshifumi Ozaki
机构
[1] Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Science of Functional Recovery and Reconstruction
[2] Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences,Institute for Pathology
[3] Childrens Hospital Los Angeles and University of Southern California,undefined
[4] University Clinic of Heinrich-Heine University,undefined
来源
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology | 2006年 / 132卷
关键词
Synovial sarcoma; Chromosome; Instability; Comparative genomic hybridization; Microarray;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To analyze the relationship between chromosomal instabilities and clinicopathological factors in synovial sarcoma (SS). Methods: Twenty-two fresh-frozen SS were analyzed by metaphase comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Additional microarray CGH was performed in 13 cases. Results: Fourteen patients with SYT–SSX1 rearrangements and nine patients with biphasic tumor subtypes had better prognosis than the eight patients with SYT–SSX2 rearrangements and 13 patients with monophasic subtypes, respectively. Gains (average 3.0) were more frequent than losses (average 1.0). Frequent gains were identified on chromosomal regions 2, 6q, 7, 8q, 12, 17q, 18q, and 21q, whereas frequent losses were over-lapped on chromosomes 1p31–p35, 3p, 6q, 16, and 17p. High-level gains were observed on chromosomes 1q21–q31, 7, 8, 12, 17q, 18q, and 21q. Thirteen monophasic and nine biphasic tumors had an average of 5.1 and 2.8 aberrations, respectively. Patients with tumors harboring numerous aberrations (≥3) had a worse clinical course. Microarray CGH more specifically detected genetic imbalances including gains in MDM2, MSH2, KCNK12, DCC, CDK2, ERBB3, SAS, and CDK4 and losses in HRAS, RASSF1, and CCND1. Gain of SAS was an important prognostic factor of SS. Conclusion: We have identified several factors influencing the prognosis of SS patients by metaphase and microarray CGH.
引用
收藏
页码:444 / 450
页数:6
相关论文
共 223 条
[1]  
Antonescu CR(2000)Strong association of SYT–SSX fusion type and morphologic epithelial differentiation in synovial sarcoma Diagn Mol Pathol 9 1-8
[2]  
Kawai A(2001)High resolution deletion analysis of constitutional DNA from neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) patients using microarray-CGH Hum Mol Genet 10 271-282
[3]  
Leung DH(1965)Synovial sarcoma; an analysis of 34 tumors Cancer 18 613-627
[4]  
Lonardo F(1995)Patients with soft-tissue sarcomas Ann Surg 221 203-205
[5]  
Woodruff JM(1994)Identification of novel genes, SYT and SSX, involved in the t(X;18)(p11.2;q11.2) translocation found in human synovial sarcoma Nat Genet 7 502-508
[6]  
Healey JH(1995)Fusion of SYT to two genes, SSX1 and SSX2, encoding proteins with homology to the Kruppel-associated box in human synovial sarcoma EMBO J 14 2333-2340
[7]  
Ladanyi M(2005)The tumor suppressor RASSF1A in human carcinogenesis: an update Histol Histopathol 20 645-663
[8]  
Bruder CE(1989)Response to mesna, doxorubicin, ifosfamide, and dacarbazine in 108 patients with metastatic or unresectable sarcoma and no prior chemotherapy J Clin Oncol 7 1208-1216
[9]  
Hirvela C(1980)A system for the surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma Clin Orthop Relat Res 153 106-120
[10]  
Tapia-Paez I(1993)Mapping of amplification units in the q13–14 region of chromosome 12 in human sarcomas: some amplica do not include MDM2 Cell Growth Differ 4 1065-1070