Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for a new-build nuclear power plant site in the UK

被引:0
作者
Iain J. Tromans
Guillermo Aldama-Bustos
John Douglas
Angeliki Lessi-Cheimariou
Simon Hunt
Manuela Daví
Roger M. W. Musson
Graham Garrard
Fleur O. Strasser
Colin Robertson
机构
[1] Jacobs,School of Geosciences
[2] University of Strathclyde,undefined
[3] Jacobs,undefined
[4] University of Edinburgh,undefined
[5] Independent Consultant/Jacobs,undefined
[6] NNB GenCo,undefined
来源
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering | 2019年 / 17卷
关键词
PSHA; Nuclear power plants; Seismic hazard; Hinkley point; UK;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) has been conducted as part of the Safety Case justification for a new-build nuclear power plant in the UK. The study followed a cost-efficient methodology developed by CH2M and associates for safety-significant infrastructure where high-level regulatory assurance is required. Historical seismicity was re-evaluated from original sources. The seismicity model considered fourteen seismic sources which, when combined, formed six alternative seismic source models. Separate models for the median ground-motion and aleatory variability were considered. The median ground-motion model comprised a suite of ground-motion equations adjusted to the site-specific conditions using VS-kappa factors. A partially non-ergodic sigma model was adopted with separate components for the inter-event variability, and single-station intra-event variability, adjusted by a partially ergodic site-to-site variability term. Site response analysis was performed using equivalent-linear random vibration theory with explicit incorporation of the variability in the ground properties using Monte Carlo simulations. The final PSHA results were obtained by convolution of the hazard at the reference rock horizon with the site amplification factors. The overall epistemic uncertainty captured by the logic tree was assessed and compared against results from earlier PSHA studies for the same site.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 36
页数:35
相关论文
共 210 条
[1]  
Abrahamson NA(2014)Summary of the ASK14 ground-motion relation for active crustal regions Earthq Spectra 30 1025-1055
[2]  
Silva WJ(2014)Kappa (κ) scaling of ground-motion prediction equations using an inverse random vibration theory approach Bull Seismol Soc Am 104 336-346
[3]  
Kamai R(2018)A streamlined approach for the seismic hazard assessment of a new nuclear power plant in the UK Bull Earthquake Eng 96 2181-2205
[4]  
Al Atik L(2006)Earthquake ground motion prediction equations for eastern North America Bull Seismol Soc Am 10 1121-1135
[5]  
Kottke A(2011)Modifications to existing ground-motion prediction equations in light of new data Bull Seismol Soc Am 85 1-4
[6]  
Abrahamson N(2014)Alternative approaches to modeling epistemic uncertainty in ground motions in probabilistic seismic-hazard analysis Seismol Res Lett 6 1-2
[7]  
Hollenback J(2008)Foreword—the H/V technique: capabilities and limitations based on the results of the SESAME project Bull Earthq Eng 94 2110-2123
[8]  
Aldama-Bustos G(2004)Nonlinear soil-site effects in probabilistic seismic-hazard analysis Bull Seismol Soc Am 12 391-430
[9]  
Tromans IJ(2014)Pan-European ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods up to 3.0 s using the RESORCE dataset Bull Earthq Eng 12 431-448
[10]  
Strasser F(2014)Erratum to: Pan-European ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods up to 3.0 s using the RESORCE dataset Bull Earthq Eng 28 1723-1735