Effectiveness of short-term knowledge communication on Baltic Sea marine genetic biodiversity to public managers

被引:0
作者
Carina Lundmark
Klas Andersson
Annica Sandström
Linda Laikre
机构
[1] Luleå University of Technology,Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences
[2] University of Gothenburg,Department of Education and Special Education
[3] Stockholm University,Department of Zoology
来源
Regional Environmental Change | 2017年 / 17卷
关键词
Baltic Sea; Genetic biodiversity; Marine management; Marine protected area; Knowledge communication; Deliberation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study is to assess the impact of two forms of short-term knowledge communication—lectures and group deliberations—on public managers’ policy beliefs regarding genetic biodiversity in the Baltic Sea. Genetic biodiversity is a key component of biological variation, but despite scientific knowledge and far-reaching political goals, genetic biodiversity remains neglected in marine management. Previous research highlights lack of knowledge among managers as one explanation to the implementation deficit. This multidisciplinary study builds on the identified need for an improved knowledge transfer between science and ongoing management. A basic knowledge package on genetic biodiversity in the Baltic Sea was presented as either a lecture or a deliberative group discussion to two separate samples of public managers who are involved in Baltic Sea and other biodiversity management at the regional level in Sweden. The empirical findings show that the communicated information has an impact on the public managers’ beliefs on genetic biodiversity of the Baltic Sea. Lectures seem more efficient to transfer knowledge on this theme. Those who received information through a lecture strengthen their confidence in area protection as a management tool to conserve genetic diversity. They were also more convinced of the obligation of authorities at national and regional level to take on larger responsibility for genetic conservation than those managers who participated in a deliberative discussion.
引用
收藏
页码:841 / 849
页数:8
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
Birnbaum S(2015)Tracing the sources of legitimacy: the impact of deliberation in participatory natural resource management Policy Sci 48 1-19
[2]  
Bodin Ö(2008)Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes Regul Gov 2 137-164
[3]  
Sandström A(2007)Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips Cell Biol Educ 6 9-20
[4]  
Black J(2006)Reconciling pluralism and consensus as political ideals Am J Polit Sci 50 634-649
[5]  
Caldwell JE(1996)Classtalk: a classroom communication system for active learning J Comput High Educ 7 3-47
[6]  
Dryzek JS(2008)Contextualising the advocacy coalition framework: theorising change in Swedish forest policy Environ Polit 17 730-748
[7]  
Niemeyer S(2006)Life on the margin: genetic isolation and diversity loss in a peripheral marine ecosystem, the Baltic Sea Mol Ecol 15 2013-2029
[8]  
Dufresne RJ(2011)The future of Baltic Sea populations: local extinction or evolutionary rescue? Ambio 40 179-190
[9]  
Gerace WJ(2010)Genetic diversity is overlooked in international conservation policy implementation Conserv Genet 11 349-354
[10]  
Leonard WJ(2005)Genetic population structure of fishes—implications for coastal zone management Ambio 34 111-119