Male mating effort in a polygynous ungulate

被引:0
作者
Fanie Pelletier
John T. Hogg
Marco Festa-Bianchet
机构
[1] Université de Sherbrooke,Département de Biologie
[2] Division of Biology,Imperial College London
[3] Faculty of Natural Sciences,undefined
[4] Montana Conservation Science Institute,undefined
[5] Limited,undefined
来源
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology | 2006年 / 60卷
关键词
Rut; Male mating effort; Ungulates; Bighorn sheep; Life history;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Survival and mating success are key fitness components of mammalian males. Because energy is limited, life history theory predicts trade-offs between current and future reproduction. While many studies have examined fitness trade-off in females, we know little about trade-offs faced by males. In polygynous species, male mating success is largely dependent upon intrasexual competition. Consequently, males have greater uncertainty over the benefits of a given allocation than over its costs, and the correlation between mating effort and success is likely much weaker in males than in females. We analyzed 14 years of data on the mating effort and survival of marked bighorn rams to investigate fitness trade-offs. Dominant rams defended single estrous ewes (“tending”) while subordinates attempted to copulate after separating the tending pair (“coursing”). We estimated the participation in tending and coursing for each ram and the effort in searching for breeding opportunities by each ram each year. We compared these three behavioral indices of male mating effort to demographic parameters, individual characteristics, and both yearly and long-term survival. Mating effort during the rut was unrelated to ram overwinter survival, but longevity was positively correlated with mating effort between 2 and 5 years of age. Persistent variation among rams is likely to explain this pattern, suggesting that in natural populations a few high quality males enjoy both high mating success and high survival.
引用
收藏
页码:645 / 654
页数:9
相关论文
共 129 条
[1]  
Bérubé CH(1999)Individual differences, longevity, and reproductive senescence in bighorn ewes Ecology 80 2555-2565
[2]  
Festa-Bianchet M(2002)Individual covariation in life-history traits: seeing the trees despite the forest Am Nat 159 96-105
[3]  
Jorgenson JT(1993)Sexual selection’s effects on male life history and the pattern of male mortality Ecology 74 1884-1892
[4]  
Cam E(1997)Density-related changes in sexual selection in red deer Proc R Soc Lond B 264 1509-1516
[5]  
Link WA(2002)Age-dependent sexual selection in bighorn rams Proc R Soc Lond B 269 165-172
[6]  
Cooch EG(2005)Selection and genetic (co)variance in bighorn sheep Evolution 59 1372-1382
[7]  
Monnat J-Y(1995)An improved test of linearity in dominance hierarchies containing unknown or tied relationships Anim Behav 50 1375-1389
[8]  
Danchin E(1998)Finding a dominance order most consistent with a linear hierarchy: a new procedure and review Anim Behav 55 827-843
[9]  
Clinton WL(1993)Matman: a program for the analysis of sociometric matrices and behavioural transition matrices Behaviour 125 157-175
[10]  
Boeuf BJL(1999)Increasing returns in the life history of Columbian ground squirrels J Anim Ecol 68 73-86