Homoharringtonine in combination with cytarabine and aclarubicin resulted in high complete remission rate after the first induction therapy in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia

被引:0
作者
J Jin
D-Z Jiang
W-Y Mai
H-T Meng
W-B Qian
H-Y Tong
J Huang
L-P Mao
Y Tong
L Wang
Z-M Chen
W-L Xu
机构
[1] the First Affiliated Hospital,Department of Hematology
[2] Zhejiang University College of Medicine,undefined
[3] Institute of Hematology,undefined
[4] Zhejiang University,undefined
[5] Key Lab of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation,undefined
[6] Ministry of Public Health,undefined
来源
Leukemia | 2006年 / 20卷
关键词
acute myeloid leukemia; homoharritonine; aclarubicin; induction;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To assess the efficacy and toxicity of HAA regimen (homoharritonine 4 mg/m2/day, days 1–3; cytarabine 150 mg/m2/day, days 1–7; aclarubicin 12 mg/m2/day, days 1–7) as an induction therapy in the treatment of de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 48 patients with newly diagnosed AML, aged 35 (14–57) years, were entered into this clinical study. The median follow-up was 26 months. Eighty-three percent of patients achieved complete remission (CR), and the first single course of induction HAA regimen resulted in CR rate of 79%. The CR rate of 100, 82 and 33% were achieved in patients with favorable, intermediate and unfavorable cytogenetics, respectively. For all patients who achieved CR, the median time from the initiation of the induction therapy to the evaluation of the remission status was 32 days. For all patients, the estimated 3 years overall survival (OS) rate was 53%, whereas for patients with M5, the estimated OS rate at 3 years was 75%. The toxicities associated with HAA regimen were acceptable, and the most common toxicity was infection. This study suggested that HAA regimen might be a well-tolerable, effective induction regimen in young adult patients with AML.
引用
收藏
页码:1361 / 1367
页数:6
相关论文
共 159 条
[1]  
Yates J(1982)Cytosine arabinoside with daunorybicin or adriamycin therapy with acute myelocytic leukemia: a CALGB study Blood 60 454-463
[2]  
Glidewell O(1991)Results of a randomized trial comparing idarubicin and cytosine arabinoside with daunorubicin and cytosine arabinoside in adult patients with newly diagnosed acute myelogenous leukemia Blood 77 1666-1674
[3]  
Wiernik P(1992)Cytarabine plus idarubicin or daunorubicin as induction and consolidation therapy for previously untreated adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia Blood 79 313-319
[4]  
Cooper MR(1992)A phase III trial comparing idarubicin and daunorubicin in combination with cytarabine in acute myelogenous leukemia: a Southeastern Cancer Study Group Study J Clin Oncol 10 1103-1111
[5]  
Steinberg D(1996)A randomized investigation of high-dose versus standard-dose cytosine arabinoside with daunorubincin in patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia: a Southwest Oncology Group study Blood 88 2841-2851
[6]  
Dosik H(1996)A randomized study of high-dose cytarabine in induction in acute myeloid leukemia Blood 87 1710-1717
[7]  
Berman E(1992)A randomized study of intermediate versus conventional-dose cytarabine as intensive induction for acute myelogenous leukemia Br J Haematol 81 170-177
[8]  
Helle GR(1990)Etoposide in acute non-lymphocytic leukemia Blood 75 27-32
[9]  
Santorsa J(1997)Randomized comparison of DAT versus ADE as induction chemotherapy in children and younger adults with acute myeloid leukemia. Results of the Medical Research Council's 10th AML trial (MRC AML 10) Blood 89 2308-2311
[10]  
McKenzie S(1992)DAE (daunorubicin, Ara-C, and etoposide) and intermediate dose Ara-C for remission induction and consolidation treatment of adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia Am J Clin Oncol 15 531-534