Performance on the processing portion of complex working memory span tasks is related to working memory capacity estimates

被引:0
作者
Lauren L. Richmond
Lois K. Burnett
Alexandra B. Morrison
B. Hunter Ball
机构
[1] Stony Brook University,Department of Psychology
[2] California State University,Department of Psychology
[3] Sacramento,Department of Psychology
[4] University of Texas at Arlington,undefined
来源
Behavior Research Methods | 2022年 / 54卷
关键词
Working memory; Processing; Storage; Individual differences; Complex span task;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC) have long been known to relate to performance in domains outside of WM, including attentional control, long-term memory, problem-solving, and fluid intelligence to name a few. Complex span WM tasks, composed of a processing component and a storage component, are often used to index WMC in these types of investigations. Capacity estimates are derived from performance on the storage component only, while processing performance is often largely ignored. Here, we explore the relationship between processing performance and WMC in a large dataset for each of three complex span tasks to better characterize how the components of these tasks might be related. We provide evidence that enforcing an 85% or better accuracy criterion for the processing portion of the task results in the removal of a disproportionate number of individuals exhibiting lower WMC estimates. We also find broad support for differences in processing task performance, characterized according to both accuracy and reaction time metrics, as a function of WMC. We suggest that researchers may want to include processing task performance measures, in addition to capacity estimates, in studies using complex span tasks to index WMC. This approach may better characterize the relationships between complex span task performance and performance in disparate domains of cognition.
引用
收藏
页码:780 / 794
页数:14
相关论文
共 171 条
  • [31] Delaney P(2012)Measuring working memory capacity with automated complex span tasks European Journal of Psychological Assessment 28 308-53
  • [32] Sahakyan L(2011)Working memory capacity and go/no-go task performance: Selective effects of updating, maintenance, and inhibition Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 37 1764-53
  • [33] Devlin KN(2015)Remembering to prepare: The benefits (and costs) of high working memory capacity Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 41 464-27
  • [34] Giovannetti T(2008)Contextual analysis of fluid intelligence Intelligence 36 26-195
  • [35] Kessler RK(2009)New effect size rules of thumb Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods 8 44-479
  • [36] Fanning MJ(2020)Structural correlates of commission errors in prospective memory Cortex 124 46-365
  • [37] Đokić R(2012)Whoops, I did it again: Commission errors in prospective memory Psychology and Aging 27 4-1388
  • [38] Koso-Drljević M(1996)The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: An individual differences approach Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 125 191-789
  • [39] Đapo N(2013)Individual differences in working memory capacity and the Stroop effect: Do high spans block the words? Learning and Individual Differences 26 461-217
  • [40] Draheim C(1996)Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer’s type Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22 353-348