Surgical outcomes for robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy compared to abdominal myomectomy

被引：11

作者：

Sangha R. ^{[1
]}

Eisenstein D.I. ^{[1
]}

George A. ^{[1
,3
]}

Munkarah A. ^{[1
]}

Wegienka G. ^{[1
,2
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202, 3031 W. Grand Blvd

[2] Biostatistics and Research Epidemiology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI

[3] Fellow- Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Methodist Hospital, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46202, 1633 N. Capitol Avenue

来源：

Journal of Robotic Surgery | 2010年 / 4卷 / 4期

关键词：

Gynecology; Myomectomy; Robotics;

D O I：

10.1007/s11701-010-0213-z

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

A retrospective cohort of 100 robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy (RM) patients and 48 laparotomic myomectomy (LM) patients at Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit, MI, USA was examined to compare surgical outcomes of RM with LM. Details of age, race, body mass index (BMI), procedure duration, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), diameter of the largest leiomyoma and number of leiomyomata removed were collected. Procedure duration was significantly longer among RM patients (median: 194 min vs. 127.5 min; Wilcoxon rank sum (WRS) P < 0.001). EBL and LOS were both significantly greater among LM patients (EBL medians 200 vs. 100 ml, WRS P < 0.001; LOS medians 3 vs. 1, WRS P < 0.01). Among the RM patients, 39.4% had a LOS of at least 2 days compared to 89.4% among LM patients. Leiomyomata characteristics did not affect the observed associations. RM could enable widespread use of a minimally invasive approach for leiomyoma treatment. © 2010 Springer-Verlag London Ltd.

引用

页码：229 / 233

页数：4

共 11 条

[1]

Day Baird D., Dunson D.B., Hill M.C., Cousins D., Schectman J.M., High cumulative incidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women: ultrasound evidence, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 188, pp. 100-107, (2003)

[2]

Falcone T., Walters M.D., Hysterectomy for benign disease, Obstet Gynecol, 111, pp. 753-767, (2008)

[3]

Mais V., Ajossa S., Guerriero S., Mascia M., Solla E., Melis G.B., Laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy: a prospective, randomized trial to evaluate benefits in early outcome, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 174, pp. 654-658, (1996)

[4]

Advincula A.P., Song A., Burke W., Reynolds R.K., Preliminary experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy, J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc, 11, pp. 511-518, (2004)

[5]

Advincula A.P., Xu X., Goudeau S., Ransom S.B., Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs, J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 14, pp. 698-705, (2007)

[6]

Nezhat C., Lavie O., Hsu S., Watson J., Barnett O., Lemyre M., Robotic- assisted laparoscopic myomectomy compared with standard laparoscopic myomectomy-a retrospective matched control study, Fertil Steril, 91, pp. 556-559, (2009)

[7]

Seracchioli R., Rossi S., Govoni F., Et al., Fertility and obstetric outcome after laparoscopic myomectomy of large myomata: a randomized comparison with abdominal myomectomy, Hum Reprod, 15, pp. 2663-2668, (2000)

[8]

Alessandri F., Lijoi D., Mistrangelo E., Ferrero S., Ragni N., Randomized study of laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy myomectomy for uterine myomas, J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 13, pp. 92-97, (2006)

[9]

Palomba S., Zupi E., Falbo A., Et al., A multicenter randomized, controlled study comparing laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy myomectomy: reproductive outcomes, Fertil Steril, 88, pp. 933-941, (2007)

[10]

Lamorte A.I., Lalwani S., Diamond M.P., Morbidity associated with abdominal myomectomy, Obstet Gynecol, 82, pp. 897-900, (1993)

← 1 2 →