Temporal comparison of global inventories of CO2 emissions from biomass burning during 2002–2011 derived from remotely sensed data

被引:0
作者
Yusheng Shi
Tsuneo Matsunaga
机构
[1] National Institute for Environmental Studies,Center for Global Environmental Research
[2] National Institute for Environmental Studies,Satellite Observation Center
[3] Chinese Academy of Sciences,State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Satellites Remote Sensing, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth
来源
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2017年 / 24卷
关键词
Biomass burning; CO; emissions; Remote sensing; Temporal variation; Fires;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Biomass burning is a large important source of greenhouse gases and atmospheric aerosols, and can contribute greatly to the temporal variations of CO2 emissions at regional and global scales. In this study, we compared four globally gridded CO2 emission inventories from biomass burning during the period of 2002–2011, highlighting the similarities and differences in seasonality and interannual variability of the CO2 emissions both at regional and global scales. The four datasets included Global Fire Emissions Database 4s with small fires (GFED4s), Global Fire Assimilation System 1.0 (GFAS1.0), Fire INventory from NCAR 1.0 (FINN1.0), and Global Inventory for Chemistry-Climate studies-GFED4s (G-G). The results showed that in general, the four inventories presented consistent temporal trend but with large differences as well. Globally, CO2 emissions of GFED4s, GFAS1.0, and G-G all peaked in August with the exception in FINN1.0, which recorded another peak in annual March. The interannual trend of all datasets displayed an overall decrease in CO2 emissions during 2002–2011, except for the inconsistent FINN1.0, which showed a tendency to increase during the considered period. Meanwhile, GFED4s and GFAS1.0 noted consistent agreement from 2002 to 2011 at both global (R2 > 0.8) and continental levels (R2 > 0.7). FINN1.0 was found to have the poorest temporal correlations with the other three inventories globally (R2 < 0.6). The lower estimation in savanna CO2 emissions and higher calculation in cropland CO2 emissions by FINN1.0 from 2002 to 2011 was the primary reason for the temporal differences of the four inventories. Besides, the contributions of the three land covers (forest, savanna, and cropland) on CO2 emissions in each region varied greatly within the year (>80%) but showed small variations through the years (<40%).
引用
收藏
页码:16905 / 16916
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Global disparities in CO2 emissions from mobility sectors of diverse economies: A macroscopic exploration across 188 countries/regions
    Zhang, Bailing
    Kang, Jing
    Feng, Tao
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS, 2024, 23
  • [32] Global CO2 emissions from dry inland waters share common drivers across ecosystems
    Keller, P. S.
    Catalan, N.
    von Schiller, D.
    Grossart, H-P
    Koschorreck, M.
    Obrador, B.
    Frassl, M. A.
    Karakaya, N.
    Barros, N.
    Howitt, J. A.
    Mendoza-Lera, C.
    Pastor, A.
    Flaim, G.
    Aben, R.
    Riis, T.
    Arce, M., I
    Onandia, G.
    Paranaiba, J. R.
    Linkhorst, A.
    del Campo, R.
    Amado, A. M.
    Cauvy-Fraunie, S.
    Brothers, S.
    Condon, J.
    Mendonca, R. F.
    Reverey, F.
    Room, E-, I
    Datry, T.
    Roland, F.
    Laas, A.
    Obertegger, U.
    Park, J-H
    Wang, H.
    Kosten, S.
    Gomez, R.
    Feijoo, C.
    Elosegi, A.
    Sanchez-Montoya, M. M.
    Finlayson, C. M.
    Melita, M.
    Oliveira Junior, E. S.
    Muniz, C. C.
    Gomez-Gener, L.
    Leigh, C.
    Zhang, Q.
    Marce, R.
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 11 (01)
  • [33] Effects of Forest Management on Total Biomass Production and CO2 Emissions from use of Energy Biomass of Norway Spruce and Scots Pine
    Routa, Johanna
    Kellomaki, Seppo
    Strandman, Harri
    [J]. BIOENERGY RESEARCH, 2012, 5 (03) : 733 - 747
  • [34] CO2 EMISSIONS FROM FOSSIL FUELS DURING THE PERIOD 2000-2004 IN ALBANIA
    Topi, D.
    Seiti, B.
    Dule, K.
    Halimi, E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ECOLOGY, 2012, 13 (02): : 442 - 450
  • [35] Temporal and Spatial Variations in Provincial CO2 Emissions in China from 2005 to 2015 and Assessment of a Reduction Plan
    Deng, Xuankai
    Yu, Yanhua
    Liu, Yanfang
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2015, 8 (05) : 4549 - 4571
  • [36] Comparison of methods to estimate the rate of CO2 emissions and coal consumption from a coal fire near Durango, CO
    Ide, S. Taku
    Orr, F. M., Jr.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 2011, 86 (01) : 95 - 107
  • [37] COMPARISON OF THE CO2 EMISSIONS FROM TWO MALEIC ANHYDRIDE PRODUCTION PROCESSES THROUGH COMPUTATIONAL SIMULATION
    Mangili, P., V
    Dias, R. F.
    Santos, L. S.
    Prata, D. M.
    [J]. LATIN AMERICAN APPLIED RESEARCH, 2019, 49 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [38] A Moderated Mediation Model of the Effect of Foreign Direct Investments on CO2 Emissions: Panel Data Evidence from GCC Countries
    Tarek Bel Hadj
    Adel Ghodbane
    [J]. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2022, 13 : 904 - 925
  • [39] Implications of system expansion for the assessment of well-to-wheel CO2 emissions from biomass-based transportation
    Wetterlund, Elisabeth
    Pettersson, Karin
    Magnusson, Mimmi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2010, 34 (13) : 1136 - 1154
  • [40] Large CO2 Emitters as Seen From Satellite: Comparison to a Gridded Global Emission Inventory
    Chevallier, Frederic
    Broquet, Gregoire
    Zheng, Bo
    Ciais, Philippe
    Eldering, Annmarie
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 49 (05)