Assessing the seismic response of existing RC buildings using the extended N2 method

被引:0
|
作者
C. Bhatt
R. Bento
机构
[1] Technical University of Lisbon,Instituto Superior Técnico
来源
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering | 2011年 / 9卷
关键词
Seismic assessment; 3D pushover analysis; Extended N2 method; Real plan-asymmetric buildings; Torsion;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Extensive studies have confirmed the good performance of the N2 method, recommended by Eurocode8, when performing pushover analyses in regular structures. However, this procedure shows lack of accuracy in predicting the torsional motion of plan-asymmetric buildings. In order to overcome this problem, Peter Fajfar and his team have proposed an extension of the method based on a combination of a pushover analysis and of an elastic response spectrum analysis. Since definitive answers about this topic have not yet been reached, this paper intends to proceed the study applying the extended N2 method to real existing RC buildings. Three real plan-asymmetric buildings with three, five and eight storeys were assessed. The results obtained with the extended N2 method were compared with the ones evaluated by means of the original N2 and with the nonlinear dynamic analysis through the use of semi-artificial ground motions. The analyses were performed for different seismic intensities in order to evaluate the torsional response of the building through different stages of structural inelasticity. The results obtained show that the extended N2 method generally reproduces in a very good fashion the real torsional behavior of the analyzed buildings. The conclusions herein outlined, added to the ones already published by the aforementioned authors, seem to confirm that the extended N2 method can be introduced in the next version of Eurocode8 as a nonlinear static procedure capable of accurately predicting the torsional response of plan-asymmetric buildings.
引用
收藏
页码:1183 / 1201
页数:18
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Assessing the seismic response of existing RC buildings using the extended N2 method
    Bhatt, C.
    Bento, R.
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2011, 9 (04) : 1183 - 1201
  • [2] Seismic assessment of existing RC buildings
    Fardis, MN
    Panagiotakos, TB
    Biskinis, D
    Kosmopoulos, A
    SEISMIC ASSESSMENT AND REHABILITATION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS, 2003, 29 : 215 - 244
  • [3] A new strategy for the seismic assessment of existing RC buildings
    Cosenza, E
    Manfredi, G
    Verderame, GM
    ANNALS OF GEOPHYSICS, 2002, 45 (06) : 817 - 831
  • [4] Seismic assessment of existing precast RC industrial buildings in Portugal
    Batalha, Nadia
    Rodrigues, Hugo
    Sousa, Romain
    Varum, Humberto
    STRUCTURES, 2022, 41 : 777 - 786
  • [5] Assessing and enhancing the seismic performance of existing RCC buildings
    Arumugam, Vijayakumar
    Natarajan, Sridhar
    Veeramani, Venkatesan
    Mahesh, Yenigandla Naga
    MATERIA-RIO DE JANEIRO, 2024, 29 (02):
  • [6] Seismic assessment of existing RC buildings based on different hazard maps
    Manfredi, V.
    Masi, A.
    BOLLETTINO DI GEOFISICA TEORICA ED APPLICATA, 2011, 52 (02) : 321 - 340
  • [7] Assessing the Seismic Performance of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings in New Zealand
    Tuleasca, Lusa
    Loo, Wei
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONCRETE REPAIR, REHABILITATION AND RETROFITTING, ICCRRR 2024, 2025, 59 : 109 - 117
  • [8] Numerical Assessment of an Innovative RC-Framed Skin for Seismic Retrofit Intervention on Existing Buildings
    Talledo, Diego Alejandro
    Rocca, Irene
    Pozza, Luca
    Savoia, Marco
    Saetta, Anna
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (21):
  • [9] A new method to assess the seismic vulnerability of existing wood frame buildings
    Loss, Cristiano
    Piazza, Maurizio
    Zonta, Daniele
    STRUCTURAL HEALTH ASSESSMENT OF TIMBER STRUCTURES, 2013, 778 : 486 - 494
  • [10] Consistency of analysis methods considered in EC8-3 for the seismic assessment of RC existing buildings
    Vincenzo Manfredi
    Angelo Masi
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2017, 15 : 3027 - 3051