Does blood pressure variability contribute to risk stratification? Methodological issues and a review of outcome studies based on home blood pressure

被引:0
作者
Kei Asayama
Fang-Fei Wei
Yan-Ping Liu
Azusa Hara
Yu-Mei Gu
Rudolph Schutte
Yan Li
Lutgarde Thijs
Jan A Staessen
机构
[1] Studies Coordinating Centre,KU Leuven Department of Cardiovascular Sciences
[2] Research Unit Hypertension and Cardiovascular Epidemiology,Department of Planning for Drug Development and Clinical Evaluation
[3] University of Leuven,undefined
[4] Tohoku University Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences,undefined
[5] Center for Epidemiological Studies and Clinical Trials and Center for Vascular Evaluations,undefined
[6] Shanghai Key Laboratory of Hypertension,undefined
[7] Shanghai Institute of Hypertension,undefined
[8] Ruijin Hospital,undefined
[9] Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine,undefined
[10] Hypertension in Africa Research Team (HART),undefined
[11] North-West University,undefined
[12] VitaK Research and Development,undefined
[13] Maastricht University,undefined
来源
Hypertension Research | 2015年 / 38卷
关键词
average real variability; beat-to-beat blood pressure; blood pressure variability; home blood pressure; variability independent of the mean index;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This review addresses methodological issues in the assessment of blood pressure variability and the predictive value of blood pressure variability derived from blood pressure readings obtained in the relaxed home environment. Preference should be given to indexes of blood pressure variability that are independent of the mean because we should evaluate the impact of blood pressure variability by eliminating the effect of blood pressure levels. Beat-to-beat blood pressure recordings outperform home blood pressure measurement in the assessment of blood pressure variability in longitudinal Belgian and Japanese population studies, whereas blood pressure variability did not incrementally predict outcome beyond blood pressure level and other cardiovascular risk factors. In conclusion, clinicians should focus on blood pressure level, given that it is the predominant risk factor and is manageable by lifestyle modifications and adequate antihypertensive drug treatment. Blood pressure variability remains a research tool that requires further prospective studies with hard end points to define its potential application, as it may be potentially useful in daily clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 101
页数:4
相关论文
共 340 条
  • [1] Asayama K(2005)Use of 2003 European Society of Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology guidelines for predicting stroke using self-measured blood pressure at home: the Ohasama study Eur Heart J 26 2026-2031
  • [2] Ohkubo T(2002)Comparison of acceptability of and preferences for different methods of measuring blood pressure in primary care BMJ 325 258-259
  • [3] Kikuya M(1998)Home blood pressure measurement has a stronger predictive power for mortality than does screening blood pressure measurement: a population-based observation in Ohasama, Japan J. Hypertens 16 971-975
  • [4] Metoki H(2006)Prediction of stroke by home ‘morning’ versus ‘evening’ blood pressure values: the Ohasama study Hypertension 48 737-743
  • [5] Obara T(2010)Home-measured blood pressure is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular risk than office blood pressure: the Finn-Home study Hypertension 55 1346-1351
  • [6] Hoshi H(2004)Antihypertensive treatment based on blood pressure measurement at home or in the physician's office: a randomized controlled trial JAMA 291 955-964
  • [7] Hashimoto J(2013)Home blood pressure variability as cardiovascular risk factor in the population of Ohasama Hypertension 61 61-69
  • [8] Totsune K(2010)Effects of beta blockers and calcium-channel blockers on within-individual variability in blood pressure and risk of stroke Lancet Neurol 9 469-480
  • [9] Satoh H(2010)Prognostic significance of visit-to-visit variability, maximum systolic blood pressure, and episodic hypertension Lancet 375 895-905
  • [10] Imai Y(2010)Effects of antihypertensive-drug class on interindividual variation in blood pressure and risk of stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lancet 375 906-915