The need for bottom-up assessments of climate risks and adaptation in climate-sensitive regions

被引:0
作者
Declan Conway
Robert J. Nicholls
Sally Brown
Mark G. L. Tebboth
William Neil Adger
Bashir Ahmad
Hester Biemans
Florence Crick
Arthur F. Lutz
Ricardo Safra De Campos
Mohammed Said
Chandni Singh
Modathir Abdalla Hassan Zaroug
Eva Ludi
Mark New
Philippus Wester
机构
[1] Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment,School of Engineering
[2] London School of Economics and Political Science,Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology
[3] University of Southampton,School of International Development
[4] Bournemouth University,Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research
[5] University of East Anglia,Geography, College of Life and Environmental Sciences
[6] University of East Anglia,Climate, Energy and Water Resources Institute
[7] University of Exeter,Department of Physical Geography
[8] National Agricultural Research Centre,African Climate & Development Initiative
[9] NIH,undefined
[10] Wageningen University and Research,undefined
[11] International Institute for Environment and Development,undefined
[12] FutureWater,undefined
[13] Utrecht University,undefined
[14] Kenya Markets Trust,undefined
[15] Indian Institute for Human Settlements,undefined
[16] University of Cape Town,undefined
[17] Overseas Development Institute,undefined
[18] International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development,undefined
来源
Nature Climate Change | 2019年 / 9卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Studies of climate change at specific intervals of future warming have primarily been addressed through top-down approaches using climate projections and modelled impacts. In contrast, bottom-up approaches focus on the recent past and present vulnerability. Here, we examine climate signals at different increments of warming and consider the need to reconcile top-down and bottom-up approaches. We synthesise insights from recent studies in three climate-sensitive systems where change is a defining feature of the human-environment system. Whilst top-down and bottom-up approaches generate complementary insights into who and what is at risk, integrating their results is a much-needed step towards developing relevant information to address the needs of immediate adaptation decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:503 / 511
页数:8
相关论文
共 188 条
[11]  
Harrington LJ(2018)The right stuff? Informing adaptation to climate change in British local government PLoS Med. 15 e1002624-41
[12]  
Bathiany S(2017)From Advocacy to action: projecting the health impacts of climate change WIREs Clim. Change 8 e457-414
[13]  
Dakos V(2018)Characterizing half‐a‐degree difference: a review of methods for identifying regional climate responses to global warming targets Philos. T. R. Soc. A 376 20160448-364
[14]  
Scheffer M(2014)Stabilization of global temperature at 1.5 °C and 2.0 °C: implications for coastal areas. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111 3268-689
[15]  
Lenton TM(2014)Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison Agric. Econ. 45 3-352
[16]  
Dessai S(2008)Why do global long‐term scenarios for agriculture differ? an overview of the AgMIP global economic model intercomparison Glob. Environ. Change 18 165-2031
[17]  
Hulme M(2013)Community level adaptation to climate change: the potential role of participatory community risk assessment Clim. Res. 58 29-20
[18]  
Lempert RJ(2013)Disconnect between science and end-users as a barrier to climate change adaptation Annu. Rev. Environ. Res. 38 393-212
[19]  
Collins MT(2007)Actionable knowledge for environmental decision making: broadening the usability of climate science Glob. Environ. Change 17 349-800
[20]  
Preston BL(2011)Linking vulnerability, adaptation, and resilience science to practice: pathways, players, and partnerships. Glob. Environ. Change 21 680-115