The need for bottom-up assessments of climate risks and adaptation in climate-sensitive regions

被引:0
作者
Declan Conway
Robert J. Nicholls
Sally Brown
Mark G. L. Tebboth
William Neil Adger
Bashir Ahmad
Hester Biemans
Florence Crick
Arthur F. Lutz
Ricardo Safra De Campos
Mohammed Said
Chandni Singh
Modathir Abdalla Hassan Zaroug
Eva Ludi
Mark New
Philippus Wester
机构
[1] Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment,School of Engineering
[2] London School of Economics and Political Science,Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology
[3] University of Southampton,School of International Development
[4] Bournemouth University,Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research
[5] University of East Anglia,Geography, College of Life and Environmental Sciences
[6] University of East Anglia,Climate, Energy and Water Resources Institute
[7] University of Exeter,Department of Physical Geography
[8] National Agricultural Research Centre,African Climate & Development Initiative
[9] NIH,undefined
[10] Wageningen University and Research,undefined
[11] International Institute for Environment and Development,undefined
[12] FutureWater,undefined
[13] Utrecht University,undefined
[14] Kenya Markets Trust,undefined
[15] Indian Institute for Human Settlements,undefined
[16] University of Cape Town,undefined
[17] Overseas Development Institute,undefined
[18] International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development,undefined
来源
Nature Climate Change | 2019年 / 9卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Studies of climate change at specific intervals of future warming have primarily been addressed through top-down approaches using climate projections and modelled impacts. In contrast, bottom-up approaches focus on the recent past and present vulnerability. Here, we examine climate signals at different increments of warming and consider the need to reconcile top-down and bottom-up approaches. We synthesise insights from recent studies in three climate-sensitive systems where change is a defining feature of the human-environment system. Whilst top-down and bottom-up approaches generate complementary insights into who and what is at risk, integrating their results is a much-needed step towards developing relevant information to address the needs of immediate adaptation decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:503 / 511
页数:8
相关论文
共 188 条
[1]  
Seneviratne SI(2016)Allowable CO Nature 529 477-171
[2]  
Donat MG(2016) emissions based on regional and impact-related climate targets Nat. Clim. Change 6 166-128
[3]  
Pitman AJ(2016)Accelerated dryland expansion under climate change Environ. Res. Lett. 11 055007-1026
[4]  
Knutti R(2018)Poorest countries experience earlier anthropogenic emergence of daily temperature extremes Sci. Adv. 4 eaar5809-497
[5]  
Wilby RL(2004)Climate models predict increasing temperature variability in poor countries Clim. Pol. 4 107-159
[6]  
Huang J(2007)Does climate adaptation policy need probabilities? Risk Anal. 27 1009-275
[7]  
Yu H(2015)Managing the risk of uncertain threshold responses: comparison of robust, optimum, and precautionary approaches Mitig. Adapt. Strat. Gl. 20 467-422
[8]  
Guan X(2002)Climate adaptation heuristics and the science/policy divide Clim. Pol. 2 145-3273
[9]  
Wang G(2007)From impacts assessment to adaptation priorities: the shaping of adaptation policy Sustain. Sci. 2 265-20
[10]  
Guo R(2015)Adaptation planning for climate change: concepts, assessment approaches, and key lessons Glob. Environ. Change 35 411-179