Micromechanics of proppant agglomeration during settling in hydraulic fractures

被引:62
作者
Tomac I. [1 ]
Gutierrez M. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, 92093, CA
[2] Colorado School of Mines, 1012, 14th St, Golden, 80401, CO
[3] Khalifa University, PO Box 127788, Abu Dhabi
关键词
DEM–CFD; Dense-phase flow; Fluid–solid coupling; Hydraulic fracture; Lubrication; Proppant settling;
D O I
10.1007/s13202-014-0151-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The micromechanics of proppant settling in quiescent fluid in a rough and relatively narrow rock fracture is investigated. The study focuses on particle–particle and particle–wall interactions in a dense-phase particle settling. The study used a coupled discrete element method and computational fluid dynamics (DEM–CFD) code because DEM–CFD is the most suitable computational method for modeling the frequent interactions of dense assembly of rigid particles and enables modeling of two-way solid–fluid interactions. Due to frequent particle–particle interactions of grains submerged in fluids, the particle interaction model in DEM is improved by the incorporation of the effects of lubrication due to a layer of fluid surrounding particles. Results of the numerical study are compared to previous experimental and theoretical relationships. The findings of the study highlight conditions that lead to proppant aggregation due to the fluid viscosity and fracture width in relation to particle diameter ratio. In the light of the DEM–CFD results, it was found that published relationships are inadequate in describing the settling rates for proppant in a rough and narrow hydraulic fracture and high fluid viscosity. Micromechanical particle interactions during settling and erratic upward and fluid counter-flow may cause proppant trajectories that are not always in the direction of gravity in a rough fracture resulting in clogging of the fracture or forming faster settling particle agglomerates. The maximum packing density 0.3–0.4 (3.9–5.9 lbs/gal) of proppant in a narrow and rough hydraulic fracture was obtained in this study, which is lower than the usually assumed one of 0.5 (9.8 lbs/gal) for any given fracture roughness. © 2015, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 434
页数:17
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Allen E., Smith P., A review of particle agglomeration, Surfaces, 85, (2001)
[2]  
Balakin B.V., Alyaev S., Hoffmann A.C., Kosinski P., Micromechanics of agglomeration forced by the capillary bridge, Restit Momen AIChE J, 59, pp. 4045-4057, (2013)
[3]  
Barnocky G., Davis R.H., Elastohy drodynamic collision and rebound of spheres: experimental verification, Phys Fluids, 31, pp. 1324-1329, (1988)
[4]  
Barton N., Choubey V., The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice, Rock Mech, 10, pp. 1-54, (1977)
[5]  
Barton N., de Quadros E.F., Joint aperture and roughness in the prediction of flow and groutability of rock masses, Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 34, (1997)
[6]  
Bouillard J., Lyczkowski R., Gidaspow D., Porosity distributions in a fluidized bed with an immersed obstacle, AIChE J, 35, pp. 908-922, (1989)
[7]  
Brunn P., The slow motion of a rigid particle in a second-order fluid, J Fluid Mech, 82, pp. 529-550, (1977)
[8]  
Clark P., Manning F., Quadir J., Guler N., Proppant transport in vertical fractures. 56th annual fall technical conference and exhibition of the society of petroleum engineers of AIME, San Antonio, Texas, October, 1981, pp. 5-7, (1981)
[9]  
Crowe C.T., Schwarzkopf J.D., Sommerfeld M., Tsuji Y., Multiphase flows with droplets and particles, (2011)
[10]  
Cundall P.A., Strack O., A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies, Geotechnique, 29, pp. 47-65, (1979)