Speech and swallowing after surgical treatment of advanced oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review of the literature

被引:0
作者
Anne Marijn Kreeft
Lisette van der Molen
Frans J. Hilgers
Alfons J. Balm
机构
[1] The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital,Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology
[2] University of Amsterdam,Institute of Phonetic Sciences/Amsterdam Center for Language and Communication (ACLC)
[3] University of Amsterdam,Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Academic Medical Center
来源
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | 2009年 / 266卷
关键词
Speech; Swallowing; Oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma; Surgery;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose of this review is the evaluation of speech and swallowing function after surgical treatment for advanced oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma. A systematic literature search (1993–2009), yielding 1,220 hits. The predefined criteria for inclusion in this systematic review were oral or oropharyngeal cancer, surgical treatment, speech and/or swallow function outcome, T-stage ≥ 2, patient cohort > 20, adequate description of the patient cohort in terms of tumor (sub) site, and low risk of bias (Cochrane criteria). Twelve studies fulfilled the predefined criteria. The results for speech more than 1 year after resection of oral or oropharyngeal cancer are reported to be moderate to good; although in the majority of patients speech is experienced as deviant. Overall sentence intelligibility scores are normal (92–98%). Swallowing is reported to be often already disturbed before treatment and is even more severely compromised after treatment. Aspiration rates of liquids vary from 12 to 50% and especially after oropharyngeal resection, pharyngeal transit times are delayed. Postoperative radiotherapy further increases function disturbances significantly. Critical subsites with regard to speech are the mobile tongue, and the soft palate and for swallowing, the floor of the mouth, the posterior base of tongue and the hard and soft palate. Prosthetic appliances (e.g., obturators, palatal augmentation prostheses) can diminish function losses considerably. Surgery for oral and oropharyngeal cancer yields function deficits, most notably with regard to swallowing. Series are small and outcome measurements vary. Therefore, to optimize pre-operative risk assessment, there is a need for internationally standardized outcome measurements.
引用
收藏
页码:1687 / 1698
页数:11
相关论文
共 123 条
[1]  
Morton RP(2003)Studies in the quality of life of head and neck cancer patients: results of a two-year longitudinal study and a comparative cross-sectional cross-cultural survey Laryngoscope 113 1091-1103
[2]  
Pauloski BR(1994)Speech and swallowing function after oral and oropharyngeal resections: one-year follow-up Head Neck 16 313-322
[3]  
Logemann JA(2002)Functional outcomes after treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the base of the tongue Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128 887-891
[4]  
Rademaker AW(2003)Quality of life after different treatment modalities for carcinoma of the oropharynx Laryngoscope 113 1949-1954
[5]  
Perlmutter MA(2009)The surgical dilemma of ‘functional inoperability’: current consensus on operability with regard to functional results Clin Otolaryngol 34 140-146
[6]  
Johnson JT(2007)A structured review and theme analysis of papers published on “quality of life” in head and neck cancer: 2000–2005 Oral Oncol 43 843-868
[7]  
Snyderman CH(2008)Methods of functional outcomes assessment following treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancer: review of the literature J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 37 2-10
[8]  
Cano ER(2005)Speech outcome after surgical treatment for oral and oropharyngeal cancer: a longitudinal assessment of patients reconstructed by a microvascular flap Head Neck 27 785-793
[9]  
Myers EN(2007)Functional outcomes after surgical reconstruction of the base of tongue using the radial forearm free flap in patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma Head Neck 29 1024-1032
[10]  
Tschudi D(2005)Efficacy of speech aid prostheses for acquired defects of the soft palate and velopharyngeal inadequacy—clinical assessments and cephalometric analysis: a memorial Sloan-Kettering study Head Neck 27 195-207