Comparative Analysis of Statistical Models for Evaluating Genotype × Environment Interaction in Rainfed Safflower

被引:21
作者
Alizadeh K. [1 ]
Mohammadi R. [2 ]
Shariati A. [3 ]
Eskandari M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Dryland Agricultural Research Institute (Dari), AREEO, Maragheh
[2] Dryland Agricultural Research Institute (Dari), Sararood Branch, AREEO, P O Box 67145-1164, Kermanshah
[3] Center of Agricultural Research and Natural Resources, AREEO, Kurdistan
[4] Center of Agricultural Research and Natural Resources, AREEO, North-Khorasan
关键词
Carthamus tinctorius; GE interaction; Stability performance; Statistical models;
D O I
10.1007/s40003-017-0279-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The main objective of this study was to compare the several statistical models, i.e., joint regression analysis (JRA), additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) and genotype and genotype × environment (GE) interaction (GGE) biplot, for analyzing of GE interaction for grain yield of rainfed safflower multi-environment trials. The effectiveness of each model was compared for identifying the best performing genotypes across environments, identifying the best genotypes for mega-environment differentiation and evaluating the yield and stability performance. Grain yield data of 13 cold-tolerant safflower breeding lines along with a check cultivar grown in three rainfed research stations for two cropping seasons were used. Environment (E) main effect accounted for 57.1% of total variation, compared to 8.8 and 34.1% for G and GE interaction effects, respectively. Spearman's rank correlation analysis indicated that the three methods (GGE biplot, AMMI analysis and JRA) were significantly correlated (P < 0.01) in ranking of genotypes for static (biological) stability, suggesting that they can be used interchangeably. All three methods identified genotypes G4 and G9 as the most stable genotypes with low-yielding performance, and the breeding line G3 as high-yielding stable genotype across environments. Based on the results, the Maragheh was an ideal test location with a demonstrated high efficiency in selecting new cultivars with a wide adaptability. The main conclusions were the similarity between the dominant genotypes in the three models. The GGE biplot was more versatile and flexible and provided a better understanding of GE interaction than the other methods. Positive increase in yield and yield stability is attributable predominately to genetic improvement in safflower breeding lines. The breeding line 415/338 could serve as a good genetic source for both high yielding and stability in safflower breeding programs for highland cold rainfed areas of Iran. © 2017 NAAS (National Academy of Agricultural Sciences).
引用
收藏
页码:455 / 465
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Alwala S., Kwolek T., McPherson M., Pellow J., Meyer D.A., Comprehensive comparison between Eberhart and Russell joint regression and GGE biplot analyses to identify stable and high yielding maize hybrids, Field Crops Res, 119, pp. 225-230, (2010)
[2]  
Annicchiarico P., Joint regression vs AMMI analysis of genotype-environment interactions for cereals in Italy, Euphytica, 94, pp. 53-62, (1997)
[3]  
Argiller O., Hebert Y., Barriere Y., Statistical analysis and interpretation of line × environment interaction for biomass yield in maize, Agronomie, 14, pp. 661-672, (1994)
[4]  
Becker H.C., Leon J., Stability analysis in plant breeding, Plant Breed, 101, pp. 1-23, (1988)
[5]  
Blanche S.B., Myers G.O., Identifying discriminating locations for cultivar selection in Louisiana, Crop Sci, 46, pp. 946-949, (2006)
[6]  
Chaturvedi M., Srivastava N., Gudipati T., Bhadauria R., Khandelwal S., Das R.R., In vitro studies in the wild species of Carthamus - C. Oxycantha L, Safflower: A Multipurpose Species with Unexploited Potential and World Adaptability. Proceedings of the 5th International Safflower Conference, pp. 47-49, (2001)
[7]  
Crossa J., Statistical analyses of multilocation trials, Adv Agron, 44, pp. 55-85, (1990)
[8]  
Dimitrios B., Christos G., Jesus R., Eva B., Separation of cotton cultivar testing sites based on representativeness and discriminating ability using GGE biplots, Agron J, 100, pp. 1230-1236, (2008)
[9]  
Ebdon J.S., Gauch H.G., Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction analysis of National Turfgrass performance trials: II. Genotype recommendation, Crop Sci, 42, pp. 497-506, (2002)
[10]  
Eberhart S.A., Russell W.A., Stability parameters for comparing varieties, Crop Sci, 6, pp. 36-40, (1966)