Twenty-five years of Australian nursing and allied health professional journals: bibliometric analysis from 1985 through 2010

被引:0
作者
Louise Wiles
Timothy Olds
Marie Williams
机构
[1] University of South Australia,Health and Use of Time Group, Division of Health Sciences
[2] University of South Australia,Nutritional Physiology Research Centre
[3] University of South Australia,Sansom Institute
来源
Scientometrics | 2013年 / 94卷
关键词
Allied health occupations; Bibliometrics; Nursing; Periodicals as topic; Research; 00-01; I1-10;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The generation of research involves producers (study authors and funders), products (studies and arising publications) and consumption (measured through readership and citation). Bibliometric analyses of research producers, products and consumption over time can be used to describe the evolution of health professions as captured in professional journal publications. Numerous bibliometric studies have been conducted however few have sampled nursing and allied health professional journals. This is despite a growing health workforce and socioeconomic pressures. The aim of this study was to use bibliometric analyses to track change in the producers, products and consumption of seven Australian nursing and allied health professional journals from 1985 through 2010. An analysis of all original research articles published in these journals was performed using a reliable bibliometric audit tool. Articles were sampled every 3 months and at 5 year intervals over a 25 year period. Information relating to authorship, the research methods used and citation patterns was collected. Data were analysed descriptively. Over the study period, all journals shifted towards publishing research that used higher study designs, reported more quantitative data, and were authored by larger research teams. The rate at which this transition occurred (greater evidence base, quantitation and collaboration) differed among the journals sampled. The changes seen in the research published in these journals are likely to be a function of the strategic purpose of each publication (to its professional readership) as well as reflect wider socioeconomic phenomena. Therefore these trends are likely to continue in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 378
页数:19
相关论文
共 105 条
[1]  
Adams J(2005)Early citation counts correlate with accumulated impact Scientometrics 63 567-581
[2]  
Allison G(2002)More than skin deep Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 48 69-70
[3]  
Cross W(2010)Monitoring and surveillance of chronic non-communicable diseases: Progress and capacity in high-burden countries Lancet 376 1861-1868
[4]  
Galea M(1985)Writing for AJAN 1985 Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing 2 2-87
[5]  
Herbert R(1985)The Australian occupational therapy journal authors’ guide Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 32 85-14
[6]  
Hodges P(2010)A new journal name for a new decade Journal of Physiotherapy 56 5-663
[7]  
Grimmer K(2011)Bibliometric analysis of articles published from 1980 to 2009 in Physical Therapy, Journal of the American Physical Therapy Association Physical Therapy 91 1-1390
[8]  
Maher C(2005)Tracking publication outcomes of National Institutes of Health grants The American Journal of Medicine 118 658-118
[9]  
Alwan A(2010)Systematic reviews in Journal of Physiotherapy Journal of Physiotherapy 56 69-70
[10]  
MacLean DR(2006)A bibliometric analysis by geographic area of published research in several biomedical fields, 1995–2003 Canadian Medical Association Journal 175 1389-211