Quantifying ecosystem services of dominate forests in the Beijing mountain area

被引:0
作者
Lichun Mo
Jiakai Liu
Jiancheng Chen
Yi Xie
机构
[1] Beijing Forestry University,School of Economics & Management
[2] Beijing Forestry University,School of Ecology and Nature Conservation
来源
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2020年 / 27卷
关键词
Ecosystem services; Forest type; Beijing mountains; Soil conservation; Water conservation; Forest biodiversity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this study, the forest landscape in the Beijing mountain area is assessed using the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs model. The results showed the natural forests have higher functional capital than the planted forests and different species contribute to different ecological functions. Specifically, Larix gmelinii forests have the highest water resources and soil conservation function which are about 334.14 m3 hm−2 year−1 and 115.92 t hm−2 year−1; Betula allegansis forests have the highest carbon storage and biodiversity function which are about 128.46 t hm−2 year−1 and 0.76. Besides soil, water is conserved more within coniferous forests than within broadleaf forests. Carbon sequestration and the functional capacity for biodiversity within a unit area of coniferous forests are much smaller than those within a unit area of a broadleaf forest. Previous studies highlight the forest management strategies will influence the ecosystem functions while in the current studies we also found the species option during the afforestation is equally important and protecting of the natural forests is more important than afforestation for maintaining the ecological functional capitals.
引用
收藏
页码:27773 / 27785
页数:12
相关论文
共 235 条
[1]  
Addison J(2016)Applying the social–ecological systems framework to the evaluation and design of payment for ecosystem service schemes in the Eurasian steppe Biodivers Conserv 25 2421-2440
[2]  
Greiner R(2007)Integrating the valuation of ecosystem services into the input–output economics of an Alpine region Ecol Econ 63 786-798
[3]  
Adrienne G(2019)Use and perceived importance of forest ecosystem services in rural livelihoods of Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh[J] Ecosyst Services 35 87-98
[4]  
Susanne K(2020)Ecohydrology in a Brazilian tropical dry forest: thinned vegetation impact on hydrological functions and ecosystem services[J] J Hydrol: Region Stud 27 100649-42
[5]  
Ahammad R(2020)Valuing forest-based ecosystem services in Bangladesh: implications for research and policies[J] Ecosyst Services 42 101069-630
[6]  
Stacey N(2000)Extending the RUSLE with the Monte Carlo error propagation technique to predict long-term average off-site sediment accumulation[J] J Soil Water Conserv 55 35-1460
[7]  
Sunderland TCH(2020)Net value of forest ecosystem services in China[J] Ecol Eng 142 105645-876
[8]  
Andrade EM(2019)Ecological policy benefit valuation based on public feedback: forest ecosystem services in Wuyishan nature reserve, China[J] Sci Total Environ 673 622-248
[9]  
Guerreiro MJS(2008)Beyond deforestation: restoring forests and ecosystem services on degraded lands Science 320 1458-1085
[10]  
Palácio HAQ(2000)Value of ecosystem services in China Chin Sci Bull 45 870-390