Fond memories of professor Gordon Tullock

被引：0

作者：

Xue Z. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] The Institute for Law and Economics, National School of Development, Peking University, 5 Yiheyuan Rd, Haidian, Beijing

来源：

Journal of Bioeconomics | 2016年 / 18卷 / 2期

关键词：

Adversarial system; Common law; Cost; Efficiency of legal systems; Public choice;

D O I：

10.1007/s10818-016-9228-5

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Gordon Tullock made lasting contribution to the economic notion of cost, while his criticism of the adversarial process in common law has generated recurring research into the efficiency of alternative legal systems. © 2016, Springer Science+Business Media New York.

引用

页码：113 / 114

页数：1

共 12 条

[1]

Alchian A.A., International encyclopedia of social sciences, (1968)

[2]

Buchanan J.M., Cost and choice: An inquiry in economic theory, (1969)

[3]

Coase R.H., The problem of social cost, Journal of Law and Economics, 3, pp. 1-44, (1960)

[4]

Knight F., Some fallacies in the interpretation of social cost, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 38, pp. 582-606, (1924)

[5]

McChesney F.S., On the procedural superiority of a civil law system: A Comment, Kyklos, 30, pp. 507-510, (1977)

[6]

Miller J.J., The non-nobelist, National Review, (2006)

[7]

Tullock G., The logic of the law, (1971)

[8]

Tullock G., On the efficient organization of trials, Kyklos, 28, pp. 745-762, (1975)

[9]

Tullock G., Two kinds of legal efficiency, Hofstra Law Review, 1, (1980)

[10]

Tullock G., Juries, The new Palgrave dictionary of economics and the law, pp. 395-400, (1998)

← 1 2 →