Marketing Communist Party membership in China

被引:0
作者
Li Han
Tao Li
机构
[1] The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology,Division of Social Science
[2] The University of Macau,Department of Government and Public Administration
来源
Public Choice | 2021年 / 188卷
关键词
Political selection; Party recruitment; Authoritarian regimes; China; O17;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The selection of political officials is under-studied in economic analysis of authoritarian politics. In the absence of elections, the autocracy alone is burdened with the task of selecting the right candidate for every political position. This paper tries to empirically investigate an authoritarian political selection market where a dictator “sells” potentially valuable political membership to eligible supporters who have to pay a “price” in terms of screening cost. We highlight one dilemma that many contemporary autocracies face, namely the need to recruit educated elites who usually have better options in the private sector and are less dependent on the regime. This paper argues that autocracies can minimize this challenge by actively screening for unobservable loyalty conditional on observed technical skills. Using micro-level Chinese Communist Party college recruitment data, we show that the party adopts a discriminative strategy of lowering (but not removing) the screening cost for high-ability students and more intensively screening for loyalty among low-ability students. Using brainwashing course scores as a measurement of loyalty provides suggestive evidence that party members of a given ability level have more loyalty than nonmembers at the same ability level.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 268
页数:27
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Acemoglu D(2000)Democratization or repression? European Economics Review Papers and Proceedings 44 683-693
[2]  
Robinson J(2001)A theory of political transitions American Economic Review 91 938-963
[3]  
Acemoglu D(2009)The economics of Communist Party membership–Tthe curious case of rising numbers and wage premium during China’s transition Journal of Development Studies 45 256-275
[4]  
Robinson J(2000)Sect, subsidy, and sacrifice: An economist’s view of ultra-orthodox Jews The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 905-953
[5]  
Appleton S(2005)Political selection Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 43-60
[6]  
Knight J(2011)Do democracies select more educated leaders? American Political Science Review 105 552-566
[7]  
Song L(2001)Communist Party membership and regime dynamics in China Social Forces 79 805-841
[8]  
Xia Q(1985)The political technocrat in Mexico and the survival of the political system Latin American Research Review 20 97-118
[9]  
Berman E(2005)Earnings differentials and ownership structure in Chinese enterprises Economic Development and Cultural Change 53 933-58
[10]  
Besley T(2000)Cooptation and corporatism in China: The logic of party adaptation Political Science Quarterly 115 517-540