Online dissemination of Cochrane reviews on digital health technologies: a cross-sectional study

被引:2
作者
De Santis, Karina Karolina [1 ]
Kirstein, Mathia [1 ]
Kien, Christina [2 ]
Griebler, Ursula [2 ]
McCrabb, Sam [3 ]
Jahnel, Tina [4 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Inst Prevent Res & Epidemiol BIPS, Dept Prevent & Evaluat, D-28359 Bremen, Germany
[2] Univ Continuing Educ Krems, Dept Evidence Based Med & Evaluat, Krems, Austria
[3] Univ Newcastle, Fac Hlth & Med, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Bremen, Fac Human & Hlth Sci 11, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Bremen, Germany
关键词
Cochrane; Review; Digital technology; Healthcare; Public health; Cross-sectional; Dissemination; Knowledge translation; Altmetric score; POLICY-MAKERS;
D O I
10.1186/s13643-024-02557-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background This cross-sectional study investigated the online dissemination of Cochrane reviews on digital health technologies.Methods We searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from inception up to May 2023. Cochrane reviews with any population (P), intervention or concept supported by any digital technology (I), any or no comparison (C), and any health outcome (O) were included. Data on review characteristics (bibliographic information, PICO, and evidence quality) and dissemination strategies were extracted and processed. Dissemination was assessed using review information on the Cochrane website and Altmetric data that trace the mentions of academic publications in nonacademic online channels. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression analysis.Results Out of 170 records identified in the search, 100 Cochrane reviews, published between 2005 and 2023, were included. The reviews focused on consumers (e.g. patients, n = 86), people of any age (n = 44), and clinical populations (n = 68). All reviews addressed interventions or concepts supported by digital technologies with any devices (n = 73), mobile devices (n = 17), or computers (n = 10). The outcomes focused on disease treatment (n = 56), health promotion and disease prevention (n = 27), or management of care delivery (n = 17). All reviews included 1-132 studies, and half included 1-10 studies. Meta-analysis was performed in 69 reviews, and certainty of evidence was rated as high or moderate for at least one outcome in 46 reviews. In agreement with the Cochrane guidelines, all reviews had a plain language summary (PLS) that was available in 3-14 languages. The reviews were disseminated (i.e. mentioned online) predominantly via X/Twitter (n = 99) and Facebook (n = 69). Overall, 51 reviews were mentioned in up to 25% and 49 reviews in 5% of all research outputs traced by Altmetric data. Dissemination (i.e. higher Altmetric scores) was associated with bibliographic review characteristics (i.e. earlier publication year and PLS available in more languages), but not with evidence quality (i.e. certainty of evidence rating, number of studies, or meta-analysis performed in review).Results Out of 170 records identified in the search, 100 Cochrane reviews, published between 2005 and 2023, were included. The reviews focused on consumers (e.g. patients, n = 86), people of any age (n = 44), and clinical populations (n = 68). All reviews addressed interventions or concepts supported by digital technologies with any devices (n = 73), mobile devices (n = 17), or computers (n = 10). The outcomes focused on disease treatment (n = 56), health promotion and disease prevention (n = 27), or management of care delivery (n = 17). All reviews included 1-132 studies, and half included 1-10 studies. Meta-analysis was performed in 69 reviews, and certainty of evidence was rated as high or moderate for at least one outcome in 46 reviews. In agreement with the Cochrane guidelines, all reviews had a plain language summary (PLS) that was available in 3-14 languages. The reviews were disseminated (i.e. mentioned online) predominantly via X/Twitter (n = 99) and Facebook (n = 69). Overall, 51 reviews were mentioned in up to 25% and 49 reviews in 5% of all research outputs traced by Altmetric data. Dissemination (i.e. higher Altmetric scores) was associated with bibliographic review characteristics (i.e. earlier publication year and PLS available in more languages), but not with evidence quality (i.e. certainty of evidence rating, number of studies, or meta-analysis performed in review).Conclusions Online attention towards Cochrane reviews on digital health technologies is high. Dissemination is higher for older reviews and reviews with more PLS translations. Measures are required to improve dissemination of Cochrane reviews based on evidence quality.Systematic review registration The study was prospectively registered at the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/mpw8u/).
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Identifying barriers and facilitators of translating research evidence into clinical practice: A systematic review of reviews [J].
Abu-Odah, Hammoda ;
Said, Nizar B. ;
Nair, Satish Chandrasekhar ;
Allsop, Matthew J. ;
Currow, David C. ;
Salah, Motasem Said ;
Abu Hamad, Bassam ;
Elessi, Khamis ;
Alkhatib, Ali ;
ElMokhallalati, Yousuf ;
Bayuo, Jonathan ;
AlKhaldi, Mohammed .
HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY, 2022, 30 (06) :E3265-E3276
[2]   Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories [J].
Aksnes, Dag W. ;
Langfeldt, Liv ;
Wouters, Paul .
SAGE OPEN, 2019, 9 (01)
[3]  
Altmetric Score, The donut and Altmetric attention score
[4]  
Altmetric Score, Altmetric score calculation
[5]  
Altmetric Score, Altmetric Attention Score modifiers
[6]  
Altmetric Score, Altmetric score explanation
[7]   Digital contact tracing technologies in epidemics: a rapid review [J].
Anglemyer, Andrew ;
Moore, Theresa H. M. ;
Parker, Lisa ;
Chambers, Timothy ;
Grady, Alice ;
Chiu, Kellia ;
Parry, Matthew ;
Wilczynska, Magdalena ;
Flemyng, Ella ;
Bero, Lisa .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, (08)
[8]   What are the variables associated with Altmetric scores? [J].
Araujo, Amanda Costa ;
Vanin, Adriane Aver ;
Nascimento, Dafne Port ;
Gonzalez, Gabrielle Zoldan ;
Pena Costa, Leonardo Oliveira .
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, 10 (01) :193
[9]   The impact of low back pain systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines measured by the Altmetric score: Cross-Sectional study [J].
Araujo, Amanda Costa ;
Gonzalez, Gabrielle Zoldan ;
Nascimento, Dafne Port ;
Pena Costa, Leonardo Oliveira .
BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2021, 25 (01) :48-55
[10]   Impact of Low Back Pain Clinical Trials Measured by the Altmetric Score: Cross-Sectional Study [J].
Araujo, Amanda Costa ;
Nascimento, Dafne Port ;
Gonzalez, Gabrielle Zoldan ;
Maher, Christopher G. ;
Pena Costa, Leonardo Oliveira .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2018, 20 (04)