The improvements of sea surface temperature simulation over China Offshore Sea in present climate from CMIP5 to CMIP6 models

被引:0
作者
Rong Deng
Shaobo Qiao
Xian Zhu
Tianyun Dong
Guolin Feng
Wenjie Dong
机构
[1] Sun Yat-sen University,School of Atmospheric Sciences, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai)
[2] Ministry of Education,Key Laboratory of Tropical Atmosphere
[3] Yangzhou University,Ocean System
[4] China Meteorological Administrations,School of Physical Science and Technology
来源
Climate Dynamics | 2023年 / 61卷
关键词
China offshore sea; Sea surface temperature; Model performance; Bias sources;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
By using the 43 Historical experiments from phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) and 45 Historical experiments from phase 5 of CMIP (CMIP5) for the period of 1950–2005, we comprehensively assess the improvements in simulating the spatial pattern, warming trend, climatology and interannual variation of sea surface temperature (SST) in China offshore sea (COS) from CMIP5 to CMIP6 models. Both CMIP6 multi-model ensemble mean (CMIP6 MME) and CMIP5 multi-model ensemble mean (CMIP5 MME) well simulated the spatial pattern of climatological-mean COS SST, but they tend to underestimate the warming trends of COS SST at both seasonal and interannual timescales, which is due to the low estimations of SST warming rate before the late 1970s, particularly for the CMIP6 models. Nevertheless, both the simulated trend biases and inter-model uncertainties are reduced from CMIP5 to CMIP6 models during the period 1979–2005. Compared to the simulated annual-mean and seasonal-mean COS SST in the CMIP5 models, the inter-model uncertainties and cold biases of SST simulated by the CMIP6 models have been significantly reduced, particularly for the autumn-mean and summer-mean SST. Similarly, the CMIP6 models perform better than the CMIP5 models in simulating the interannual variation of COS SST, as evidenced by a much lower interannual variability skill score over the South China Sea and Huang&Bo China Sea. Furthermore, more than 60% of CMIP6 models perform better than their counterpart CMIP5 models in simulating the spatial patterns and interannual variations of annual-mean and seasonal-mean COS SST based on the rank of individual models performance and comprehensive ranking measure ordering. Additionally, the insignificant improvement of the evident warm bias in the East China Sea during winter and spring and cold bias in the Huang&Bo China Sea during spring and summer from CMIP5 to CMIP6 models is primarily associated with the defect of the ocean dynamical processes.
引用
收藏
页码:5111 / 5130
页数:19
相关论文
共 153 条
[1]  
Behringer DW(1998)An improved coupled model for ENSO prediction and implications for ocean initialization. Part I: The ocean data assimilation system Mon Weather Rev 126 1013-1021
[2]  
Ming J(2009)Spatial and temporal oscillation and long-term variation in sea surface temperature field of the South China Sea (In Chinese) J Oceanogr Taiwan Strait 28 559-568
[3]  
Leetmaa A(2012)The relationship between interannual variations of summer precipitation in eastern China and the SST anomalies in the East China Sea and its adjacent seas (In Chinese) Chin J Atmos Sci 36 35-45
[4]  
Cai RS(2016)Impacts of and adaptation to inter-decadal marine climate change in coastal China sea Int J Climatol 36 3770-3780
[5]  
Zhang QL(2017)Robust surface warming in Offshore China Seas and its relationship to the East Asian Monsoon Wind Field and Ocean Forcing on Interdecadal Time Scales J Clim 30 8987-9004
[6]  
Qi QH(1992)Latent and sensible heat flux anomalies over the northern oceans: the connection to monthly atmospheric circulation J Clim 5 354-369
[7]  
Cai RS(2011)Probabilistic projections of climate change over China under the SRES A1B scenario using 18 AOGMs J Clim 24 4741-4756
[8]  
Tan HJ(2010)Surface flux observations on the Southeastern Tropical Pacific Ocean and attribution of SST errors in coupled ocean-atmosphere models J Clim 23 4152-4174
[9]  
Huang RH(2002)A cautionary note on the interpretation of EOFs J Clim 15 216-225
[10]  
Cai RS(2021)Evaluation of extremes precipitation over Asia in CMIP6 models Clim Dyn 57 1751-1769