Treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: A systematic review

被引：53
作者：
Harris J.D. [1 ]
Erickson B.J. [1 ]
Bush-Joseph C.A. [1 ]
Nho S.J. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush Medical College of Rush University, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago IL 60612
来源：
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine | 2013年 / 6卷 / 3期
关键词：
Arthroscopy; Femoroacetabular impingement; Hip; Labral tear; Surgical dislocation;
D O I：
10.1007/s12178-013-9172-0
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
The purpose of this review is to determine if there is a difference in outcomes after: (1) nonsurgical vs surgical treatment of FAI; (2a) surgical dislocation with greater trochanteric osteotomy, (2b) anterior mini-open, (2c) arthroscopic plus mini-open, and (2d) arthroscopic surgery for FAI; (3) difference in complication and re-operation rates; and (4a) labral refixation and (4b) labral debridement for labral injuries. A systematic review of multiple databases was performed after PROSPERO registration and using PRISMA guidelines. Level I-IV evidence clinical studies with minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Data were compared using 2-sample and 2-proportion Z-test calculators. Study methodological quality was analyzed using Modified Coleman Methodology Score (MCMS). Recommendations were made using SORT (Strength Of Recommendation Taxonomy). Twenty-nine studies were included (2369 subjects; 2507 hips). MCMS was poor. Mean subject age was 34.4+/-8.4 years and mean follow-up was 3.1+/-0.9 years. Statistically significant differences were observed following both nonsurgical and surgical treatment, with greater (P < 0.05) improvements following surgery (SORT B), without consistent significant differences observed between different surgical techniques (SORT C). There was a greater (P < 0.05) reoperation and complication rate following surgical dislocation vs mini-open and arthroscopic techniques (SORT A). Clinical outcomes were significantly better (P < 0.05) following labral refixation vs debridement (SORT B). Outcomes of operative treatment of femoroacetabular impingement are significantly better than nonsurgical management. Surgical treatment significantly improves outcomes, with no consistent significant differences exhibited between open and arthroscopic techniques. Open surgical dislocation has significantly greater reoperation and complication rates vs mini-open and arthroscopic techniques. Outcomes of labral refixation are significantly better than debridement in patients with labral injuries. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York.
引用
收藏
页码：207 / 218
页数：11
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Ganz R., Parvizi J., Beck M., Leunig M., Notzli H., Siebenrock K.A., Femoroacetabular impingement: A cause for osteoarthritis of the hip, Clin Orthop Relat Res., 417, pp. 112-120, (2003)
[2]  
Larson C.M., Giveans M.R., Stone R.M., Arthroscopic debridement vs refixation of the acetabular labrum associated with femoroacetabular impingement: Mean 3.5-year follow-up, Am J Sports Med, 40, pp. 1015-1021, (2012)
[3]  
Hack K., Di Primio G., Rakhra K., Beaule P.E., Prevalence of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement morphology in asymptomatic volunteers, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 92, pp. 2436-2444, (2010)
[4]  
Krych A.J., Thompson M., Knutson Z., Scoon J., Coleman S.H., Arthroscopic labral repair vs selective labral debridement in female patients with femoroacetabular impingement: A prospective randomized study, Arthroscopy, 29, 1, pp. 46-53, (2013)
[5]  
Malviya A., Stafford G.H., Villar R.N., Impact of arthroscopy of the hip for femoroacetabular impingement on quality of life at a mean follow-up of 3.2 years, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 94, pp. 466-470, (2012)
[6]  
Tanzer M., Noiseux N., Osseous abnormalities and early osteoarthritis: The role of hip impingement, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 429, pp. 170-177, (2004)
[7]  
Emara K., Samir W., El Motasem H., Ghafar K.A., Conservative treatment for mild femoroacetabular impingement, J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 19, pp. 41-45, (2011)
[8]  
Liberati A., Altman D.G., Tetzlaff J., Mulrow C., Gotzsche P.C., Ioannidis J.P., Et al., The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration, J Clin Epidemiol., 62, 10, (2009)
[9]  
PROSPERO - International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, (2013)
[10]  
OCEBM 2011 Levels of Evidence System
12345