Uncertainty characterization under measurement errors using maximum likelihood estimation: cantilever beam end-to-end UQ test problem

被引:0
作者
Taejin Kim
Guesuk Lee
Byeng D. Youn
机构
[1] Seoul National University,Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
[2] Seoul National University,Institute of Advanced Machines and Design
来源
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization | 2019年 / 59卷
关键词
Uncertainty characterization; Uncertainty modeling; Measurement error; Systematic measurement error; Random measurement error; Maximum likelihood estimation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
One goal of uncertainty characterization is to develop a probability distribution that is able to properly characterize uncertainties in observed data. Observed data may vary due to various sources of uncertainty, which include uncertainties in geometry and material properties, and measurement errors. Among them, measurement errors, which are categorized as systematic and random measurement errors, are often disregarded in the uncertainty characterization process, even though they may be responsible for much of the variability in the observed data. This paper proposes an uncertainty characterization method that considers measurement errors. The proposed method separately distinguishes each source of uncertainty by using a specific type of probability distribution for each source. Next, statistical parameters of each assumed probability distribution are estimated by adopting the maximum likelihood estimation. To demonstrate the proposed method, as a case study, the method was implemented to characterize the uncertainties in the observed deflection data from the tip of a cantilever beam. In this case study, the proposed method showed greater accuracy as the amount of available observed data increased. This study provides a general guideline for uncertainty characterization of observed data in the presence of measurement errors.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 333
页数:10
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Agarwal H(2004)Uncertainty quantification using evidence theory in multidisciplinary design optimization Reliab Eng Syst Saf 85 281-294
[2]  
Renaud JE(2017)Variational inference: a review for statisticians J Am Stat Assoc 112 859-877
[3]  
Preston EL(2016)Nonparametric approach for uncertainty-based multidisciplinary design optimization considering limited data Struct Multidiscip Optim 54 1671-1688
[4]  
Padmanabhan D(2015)Efficient implementation of Markov chain Monte Carlo when using an unbiased likelihood estimator Biometrika 102 295-313
[5]  
Blei DM(1996)Different methods are needed to propagate ignorance and variability Reliab Eng Syst Saf 54 133-144
[6]  
Kucukelbir A(2008)A probabilistic construction of model validation Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197 2585-2595
[7]  
McAuliffe JD(2007)Sensitivity analysis with mixture of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties AIAA J 45 2337-2349
[8]  
Cho S-g(2006)Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91 1175-1209
[9]  
Doucet A(2016)Hierarchical model calibration for designing piezoelectric energy harvester in the presence of variability in material properties and geometry Struct Multidiscip Optim 53 161-173
[10]  
Pitt M(2006)Uncertainty quantification in simulation science J Comput Phys 217 1-4