Introduction of Directly Observed Procedural Skills (DOPS) as a Part of Competency-Based Medical Education in Otorhinolaryngology

被引:0
作者
Mohan Bansal
机构
[1] CU Shah Medical College,
来源
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery | 2019年 / 71卷
关键词
Directly Observed Procedural Skills; Workplace-based assessment; Otorhinolaryngology;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Directly Observed Procedural/Practical Skill (DOPS) is a relatively new but reliable tool for formative assessment. The lack of desired awareness regarding DOPS among the Otorhinolayngologists of India made us to conduct this study. The aim of the study was introduction of DOPS in Oto-rhino-laryngology Department. The objectives of the study were: (1) To prepare lists of Oto-rhino-laryngology procedures for DOPS, (2) To conduct Orientation program of DOPS for the participants, (3) To prepare a structured list of items for the rating scale, (4) To facilitate and conduct DOPS encounters of different Oto-rhino-laryngology procedures. The study was conducted in a tertiary care medical college hospital from April 2018 to August 2018. Thirty-three trainees and 5 trainers participated. The 421 DOPS encounters involved 41 Oto-rhino-laryngology procedures. For checking the association between average time and clinical settings and Oto-rhino-laryngology procedures and DOPS encounters, the nonparametric test χ2 test was employed. Male trainees (63.63%) outnumbered female trainees. Mostly trainees (91%) were aged 22–25 years. Approximately half (49%) of the Oto-rhino-laryngology procedures (20/41) and 9/10th (86.22%) of DOPS encounters (363/421) were conducted in OPD. The average time taken to complete the E.N.T. procedures and DOPS encounters was 15 min or less in the majority (91% and 98%) of the Oto-rhino-laryngology procedures (38/41) and DOPS encounters (414/421). DOPS was introduced as a learning tool in the Oto-rhino-laryngology Department of our medical college. For assessing the “competency level” of trainees for E.N.T. procedures, DOPS is a high quality instrument as it tests the candidate at the “does” level.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 166
页数:5
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Setna Z(2010)Evaluating the utility of work-place assessment tools for specialty training Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 24 767-782
[2]  
Jha V(2007)Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31 Med Teach 29 855-871
[3]  
Boursicot KAM(2006)Practical experience of using directly observed procedures, mini clinical examinations, and peer observation in pre-registration house officer (FY1) trainees Postgrad Med J 82 285-288
[4]  
Roberts TE(2011)Performance in assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa conference Med Teach 33 370-383
[5]  
Norcini J(2018)Direct observation of procedural skills in otorhinolaryngology training Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol 56 7-14
[6]  
Burch V(1998)Improving in-training evaluation programs J Gen Intern Med 13 317-323
[7]  
Morris A(2003)Assessing the performance of doctors in training BMJ 327 s91-s92
[8]  
Hewitt J(2015)Surgical trainers’ experience and perspectives on workplace-based assessments J Surg Educ 72 979-984
[9]  
Roberts C(2017)Effect of formative evaluation using direct observation of procedural skills in assessment of postgraduate students of obstetrics and gynecology: prospective study J Adv Med Educ Prof 5 1-5
[10]  
Boursicort K(2002)Selecting performance assessment methods for experienced physicians Med Educ 36 910-917