Comparative analysis of groundwater contaminant sources identification based on simulation optimization and ensemble Kalman filter

被引:0
作者
Jiuhui Li
Zhengfang Wu
Hongshi He
Wenxi Lu
机构
[1] Northeast Normal University,Key Laboratory of Geographical Processes and Ecological Security in Changbai Mountains, Ministry of Education, School of Geographical Sciences
[2] University of Missouri,School of Natural Resource
[3] Jilin University,Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment, Ministry of Education
[4] Jilin University,College of New Energy and Environment
来源
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2022年 / 29卷
关键词
Comparative analysis; Ensemble Kalman filter; Groundwater contamination; Simulation optimization; Source identification;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The location and release history of groundwater contaminant sources (GCSs) are usually unknown after groundwater contamination is detected, thereby greatly hindering the design of contamination remediation schemes and contamination risk assessments. Many previous studies have used prior information such as the observed contaminant concentrations (OCC) to obtain information of GCSs, and various methods have been proposed for identifying GCSs, including simulation optimization (S/O) and ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) methods. For the first time, the present study compared the suitability of the S/O and EnKF methods for GCSs identification based on two case studies by specifically considering the calculation time and effectiveness of GCS identification. The results showed that EnKF could reduce the calculation time required by more than 62% compared with S/O. However, the time saved did not compensate for the poor accuracy of the GCSs identification results. When the simulated contaminant concentrations (SCC) were used for GCSs identification, the MRE of the identification results with the S/O and EnKF methods were 2.79% and 5.09% in case one, respectively, and were 4.75% and 6.72% in case two. When the OCC were used for GCSs identification, the MRE of the identification results with the S/O and EnKF methods were 27.77% and 110.74% in case one, respectively, and 27.53% and 60.61% in case two. The identification results obtained using the EnKF method were not credible and the superior performance of the S/O method was obvious, thereby indicating that the EnKF method is much less suitable for actual GCSs identification compared with the S/O method.
引用
收藏
页码:90081 / 90097
页数:16
相关论文
共 111 条
[41]  
Chen JA(1994)A genetic algorithm tutorial Stat Comput 4 106-undefined
[42]  
Hou ZY(2018)Simultaneous identification of a contaminant source and hydraulic conductivity via the restart normal-score ensemble Kalman filter Adv Water Resour 112 501-undefined
[43]  
Lu WX(2019)Identifying the release history of a groundwater contaminant source based on an ensemble surrogate model J Hydrol 572 1-undefined
[44]  
Jha M(2012)A sparse grid based Bayesian method for contaminant source identification Adv Water Resour 37 51-undefined
[45]  
Datta B(2016)A Kriging surrogate model coupled in simulation–optimization approach for identifying release history of groundwater sources J Contam Hydrol 185 undefined-undefined
[46]  
Jiang X(2020)Identifying groundwater contaminant sources based on a KELM surrogate model together with four heuristic optimization algorithms - sciencedirect Adv Water Resour 138 undefined-undefined
[47]  
Ma R(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[48]  
Wang Y(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[49]  
Kuhnt S(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[50]  
Steinberg DM(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined